Click here to close
New Message Alert
The libz Never Gave Trump Any Benefits Of…


The libz Never Gave Trump Any Benefits Of…  

  Click Here to have an E-mail Sent to you when a new message is added to this thread
Author: TheCrow   Date: 7/12/2021 1:48:45 PM  +3/-1   Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or  In New Window

Trump was a serial liar. Even given the wide latitude allowed political statements, he regularly engaged in openly false and misleading statements. Often contradictory lies which somehow in his mind were rational. He lied about the danger of the novel coronavirus because he didn't want to create a panic? I thought 'leaders' were expected to successfully find a way to minimize loss, not avoind and pretend the issue doesn't exist.


Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus


"Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus is a Latin phrase meaning "false in one thing, false in everything." At common law, it is the legal principle that a witness who testifies falsely about one matter is not credible to testify about any matter. Although many common law jurisdictions have rejected a categorical application of the rule, the doctrine has survived in some American courts."


Under those circumstances, it is reasonable to doubt every one of Trump's statements until verified as fact. Nothing to dio with 'giving him a break'.


 


Y'all (frog boys) are rightfully distraught at Biden's election. He is a perpetual 'also ran' and proof that any candidate opposing Trump who had a modicum of rational presentability and minimal experience leading a political party would have beaten Trump after his la la land novel coronavirus period.


Biden's president? Fine. Not a fan, but he's not actively abti-American like Trump is and was. Your presenting him as less than Compos mentis further degrades Trump- he, a sitting president, lost to Joe Biden. Joe Biden. Joe Biden beat your perfect superman.


 


Oh, review some of Trump's speeches= he rambles incoherently all the time, spitting out sound bites. "Sound Bites" are meant to be repeated out of context, standing on their own emotional impact- "MAGA!", for instance. 


"Some very fine people on both sides" including neo-nazis. Hard to visualize anybody who identifies as a 'Nazi' as a fine person.


 


REPORTER: Mr. President, are you putting what you’re calling the alt-left and white supremacists on the same moral plane?


TRUMP: I am not putting anybody on a moral plane, what I’m saying is this: you had a group on one side and a group on the other, and they came at each other with clubs and it was vicious and horrible and it was a horrible thing to watch, but there is another side. There was a group on this side, you can call them the left. You’ve just called them the left, that came violently attacking the other group. So you can say what you want, but that's the way it is.


REPORTER: You said there was hatred and violence on both sides?


TRUMP: I do think there is blame – yes, I think there is blame on both sides. You look at, you look at both sides. I think there’s blame on both sides, and I have no doubt about it, and you don't have any doubt about it either. And, and, and, and if you reported it accurately, you would say.


REPORTER: The neo-Nazis started this thing. They showed up in Charlottesville.


TRUMP: Excuse me, they didn't put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group – excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down, of to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.


 


And I think it is time to reexamine those who fought in the Civil War. One side was determined to destroy the United States of America in order to continue owning people, ensavement. The destruction of America to enslave people is heroic?


 
    Return-To-Index   Display Full Msg Thread  FLAG This Message