Read the damn link  

Reuters used information to make  the case that courts dismissed multiple lawsuits alleging fraud with  cases not about election fraud.  Example the Supreme courtcase was about violation of the constitution, not fraud.  Yet, Reuters listed it as proof.  
They even used what Barr said about it on Dec 3, that he found no evidence.  What Barr said is NOT A COURT CASE.  How can they make a claim about court cases without using court cases as references.  Besides that Barr does not know, he already admitted he did not investigate it.

If Reuters would have said " many people believe that there was no election fraud ". Then that's is the truth, but the claim they make is not even supported with the references they used.

useful idiot