Click here to close
New Message Alert
Totally disagree


Totally disagree  

  Click Here to have an E-mail Sent to you when a new message is added to this thread
Author: bladeslap   Date: 11/21/2021 10:41:07 PM  +1/-3   Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or  In New Window

Zero evidence found 

If there was credible evidence, there would have been legal action.

Zero evidence. If what you were saying was credible, Trump would had been in court or his supporters.

Here is what the legal system considers evidence:

Standards of Evidence. In any type of legal case, there are different standards of evidence by which the case is proved. The different standards are: preponderance of the evidence; clear and convincing evidence; beyond a reasonable doubt.

Does your "Evidence" meet any of that? Apparently not. 

The other thing that makes it clear this is a stunt is that Trump warned everyone before the election that if he loses, it's because it was rigged. That pretty much dismissed his claim to a rigged election since he warned you he would go down this path.

 Old guy, it didn't happen and it wasn't rigged and no court, conservative or liberal, all courts threw out the cases. All courts

Georgia Judge Dismisses Trump's Election Lawsuit | Law & Crime (lawandcrime.com)

 

No Evidence Of Fraud: Judge Throws Out Trump Campaign Lawsuit In Georgia (hillreporter.com)

In blistering ruling, judge throws out Trump suit in Pa.

In blistering ruling, judge throws out Trump suit in Pa. (apnews.com)

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A federal judge issued a scathing order Saturday dismissing the Trump campaign’s futile effort to block the certification of votes in Pennsylvania, shooting down claims of widespread irregularities with mail-in ballots.

The case was always a long shot to stop President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration, but it was President Donald Trump’s best hope to affect the election results through the courts, mostly because of the number of electoral votes, 20, at stake in Pennsylvania. His personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, stepped into a courtroom for the first time in decades to argue the case this past week.

U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Brann wrote in his order that Trump had asked the court to disenfranchise almost 7 million voters.

“One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption,” Brann wrote, so much that the court would have no option but to stop the certification even though it would impact so many people. “That has not happened.”

----------

This is what we are talking about. Trump brought zero to the table in trying to "prove" any fraud. It couldn't be proven because it didn't happen

I wish you woudl come to your senses Old guy

 


 
    Return-To-Index   Display Full Msg Thread  FLAG This Message

Dear Old Guy +3/-3 Lux-Bona 11/21/2021 8:03:50 AM