No,
Im saying if the merits of these cases are decided at the state level
even if Judge Thomas deccided, L vs V was judicial overreach
the state and even federal legislatures could not and would never support
a return to old Virginia's "anti-misegenation laws"
Why?
Because,
following the doctrine of "Stare decisis"
the states have --already--established legal precidents by issuing
marriage licenses to interracial married couples. (By the millions)
..please define a "racial purity" that applies!
Ridiculous! ("one drop of [xxx] blood?!)
The same might also hold true concerning gay marriage
the states have alresdy recognized and issued gay marriage licenses
So they can't simply --retroactively-- disolve such unions!
That said,
No such "president" exists for defining or legalizing "abortion" nation-wide
it is well within the rights of state legislatures to revise or limit
their own legal definition of "ABORTION"
they already have established different Legal limits and definitions
within the broad and undefined "Rights" and "semantic argurneys" that originally establishEd legal abortion at the federal level. by judicial fiat! (Roe vs Wade)
You Lib tools --love -- the Supreme Court when they
"legislate from the bench"
But according to the "Bill of Rights"
thats not their job!
Useful Idiot!
|
+2/-3 Shooting Shark 6/26/2022 11:31:23 PM