Click here to close

New Message Alert

I can't 'defend' what is mere fact: more voters turnout for presidential

I can't 'defend' what is mere fact: more voters turnout for presidential

Author: TheCrow Date: 7/8/2022 3:54:27 PM +3/-1 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

I can't 'defend' what is mere fact: more voters turnout for presidential elections than mid-terms, referendums, etc.

And I cite a reliable source to reinforce my statement.

Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread FLAG This Message

Gas mileage +4/-3 Old Guy 7/8/2022 11:03:37 AM

Still Sore Trump got his head handed to him in the last election? +4/-2 bladeslap 7/8/2022 11:10:03 AM

Do you really think Biden was elected president? That's funny +3/-3 observer II 7/8/2022 11:20:02 AM

You live in NJ, explain this. +4/-3 Old Guy 7/8/2022 11:28:29 AM

Oh my!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Tune in to see how the moderator extracts.............. +2/-3 observer II 7/8/2022 11:51:11 AM

Just a guess as I'm not from New Jersey- but people tend to turn out for

+3/-1 TheCrow 7/8/2022 2:18:15 PM

The governor's race is far more important to the people in Jersey than the +3/-2 observer II 7/8/2022 2:27:31 PM

‘Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eye +4/-0 TheCrow 7/8/2022 2:31:05 PM

Sucks when you're made to look foolish. You can't defend this (NT) +1/-3 observer II 7/8/2022 2:38:24 PM

I can't 'defend' what is mere fact: more voters turnout for presidential +3/-1 TheCrow 7/8/2022 3:54:27 PM

That doesn't prove anything lib. More votes than voters. FACT (NT) +2/-2 observer II 7/11/2022 8:54:02 AM

"More votes than voters. FACT" Cite it or bite it. +2/-1 TheCrow 7/11/2022 1:29:59 PM