Click here to close
New Message Alert
Cite the source


Cite the source   

  Click Here to have an E-mail Sent to you when a new message is added to this thread
Author: TheCrow   Date: 7/12/2022 4:26:17 PM  +3/-0   Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or  In New Window

There is no one on the left that can beat Trump!


Interesting statement. You believe that everybody who opposes Trump is left of his postions? You know that makes Trump, and his followers extreme righties? I'm glad you admit that, it's a very short step from there to acknowledge your white nationalism.


 


Even the left biased polls show Trump would win.


Cite one.


What if Joe Biden doesn't run? After all, Trump was so bad, he made Biden look like a better choice.


 


More than 2 mil people have recently switched from the Democrats to the republicans.


Cite that, too.


 


 


Policies matter, you can't force CRT, higher taxes, defunding police, reduction of law enforcement, more regulations, less border enforcement, just generally a goverment that does not work for the people and is totally incompetent.  You can't expect the people to support you, when you fail.


OOH! Trumpist boogeymen!


CRT? Nobody's teaching CRT. There are discussions of CRT being reflected in American law and culture, to promote understanding of the issue and resolve it.


 





Fox News has mentioned “critical race theory” 1,300 times in less than four months. Why? Because critical race theory (CRT) has become a new bogeyman for people unwilling to acknowledge our country’s racist history and how it impacts the present.





To understand why CRT has become such a flash point in the culture, it is important to understand what it is and what it is not. Opponents fear that CRT admonishes all white people for being oppressors while classifying all Black people as hopelessly oppressed victims. These fears have spurred school boards and state legislatures from Tennessee to Idaho to ban teachings about racism in classrooms. However, there is a fundamental problem: these narratives about CRT are gross exaggerations of the theoretical framework. The broad brush that is being applied to CRT is puzzling to academics, including some of the scholars who coined and advanced the framework.




 



Alexandra Gibbons


Research Intern - Governance Studies





CRT does not attribute racism to white people as individuals or even to entire groups of people. Simply put, critical race theory states that U.S. social institutions (e.g., the criminal justice system, education system, labor market, housing market, and healthcare system) are laced with racism embedded in laws, regulations, rules, and procedures that lead to differential outcomes by race. Sociologists and other scholars have long noted that racism can exist without racists. However, many Americans are not able to separate their individual identity as an American from the social institutions that govern us—these people perceive themselves as the system. Consequently, they interpret calling social institutions racist as calling them racist personally. It speaks to how normative racial ideology is to American identity that some people just cannot separate the two. There are also people who may recognize America’s racist past but have bought into the false narrative that the U.S. is now an equitable democracy. They are simply unwilling to remove the blind spot obscuring the fact that America is still not great for everyone.


Scholars and activists who discuss CRT are not arguing that white people living now are to blame for what people did in the past. They are saying that white people living now have a moral responsibility to do something about how racism still impacts all of our lives today. Policies attempting to suffocate this much-needed national conversation are an obstacle to the pursuit of an equitable democracy. Supporters of CRT bans often quote Martin Luther King Jr’s proclamation that individuals should be viewed by the content of their character instead of the color of their skin, ignoring the context of the quote and the true meaning behind it.


To better understand how widespread these efforts are to ban critical race theory from U.S. classrooms, we did an assessment of anti-CRT state legislation. Here’s what we found:



  • Nine states (Idaho, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Arizona, and North Dakota) have passed legislation. Arizona’s legislation was overturned in November by the Arizona Supreme Court.

  • None of the state bills that have passed even actually mention the words “critical race theory” explicitly, with the exception of Idaho and North Dakota.

  • The legislations mostly ban the discussion, training, and/or orientation that the U.S. is inherently racist as well as any discussions about conscious and unconscious bias, privilege, discrimination, and oppression. These parameters also extend beyond race to include gender lectures and discussions.

  • State actors in Montana and South Dakota have denounced teaching concepts associated with CRT. The state school boards in Florida, Georgia, Utah, and Alabama introduced new guidelines barring CRT-related discussions. Local school boards in Georgia, North Carolina, Kentucky, and Virginia also criticized CRT.

  • Nearly 20 additional states have introduced or plan to introduce similar legislation.


You can find a summary of this legislation in the appendix to this post.


The approach of some Republican-led state legislatures is a method for continuing to roll back racial progress regarding everything from voting rights to police reform. This is a horrible idea and does an injustice to our kids. Laws forbidding any teacher or lesson from mentioning race/racism, and even gender/sexism, would put a chilling effect on what educators are willing to discuss in the classroom and provide cover for those who are not comfortable hearing or telling the truth about the history and state of race relations in the United States. Ironically, “making laws outlawing critical race theory confirms the point that racism is embedded in the law,” as sociologist Victor Ray noteda>.


Some parents are worried about their kids learning things in school that they do not have the capacity to address. As a college professor who does teach CRT as one of the many theoretical frameworks that I bring into the classroom, students are alarmed by how little they have learned about inequality. They are upset at their schools, teachers, and even their parents. So, this is the conundrum: teachers in K-12 schools are not actually teaching CRT. But teachers are trying to respond to students asking them why people are protesting and why Black people are more likely to be killed by the police.


Ultimately, we cannot employ colorblind ideology in a society that is far from colorblind. Everyone sees it, whether they acknowledge it consciously or not. As I wrote in a previous Brookings article on whether the U.S. is a racist country, systemic racism can explain racial disparities in police killings, COVID-19, and the devaluing of homes in Black neighborhoods. If we love America, we should want it to be the best it can be. Rather than run from the issue of racism in America, we should confront it head on. Our kids and country will be better for it.


 


Defunding police is not an issue in any election. It is a trigger phrase to agitate Trumpists.


Do you believe that law enforcement is overworked and underpaid? I do.


Do believe that they are the proper assets to deal with any social issue? I don't.


More than half of 911 calls do not require LEO response, so why are they routinely sent? Because we don't have the policies and structure in place to do otherwise:


Somebody off their nut and/or threatening self harm? Send a cop. Wouldn't it be better to send somebody less confrontational and perhaps trained to deal with the issue?


 


"We do not know if Trump will run.  I personally think he just pulls that string every once and awhile to see your head explode.  The right has many people that can run and beat anyone today from the left.  After all many of the voting issues have been cleaned up, voting fraud will be much harder."


You're half right- we don't know if Trump will run, or be able to run. But he intends to influence the GoP as much as possible. And that is diminishing, too.


"voting fraud will be much harder" Voter fraud is exceptionally rare in American elections. Another Trump excuse and lie.


Provide evidence of significant election fraud.


Georgia has examined the 2020 election three times, verifying the result.


Trump lost. Done. America survived the Trump presidency in spite of the highest unemployment ever, the sharpest economic contraction since the Great Depression and a million dead by Covid.




 
    Return-To-Index   Display Full Msg Thread  FLAG This Message

The donwfall of Trump - Over half the GOP no longer want Trump +3/-1 bladeslap 7/12/2022 11:07:10 AM