Pooty- why is it EVERY sexual animal displays homosexuality if it isn't   

Pooty- why is it EVERY sexual animal displays homosexuality if it isn't 

As a deeply closeted Lib -tard I don't expect you to understand this issue. You seem to think you're a "Republican" and seem to advocate for returning the Republican Party to being a scape goat for the Democrat mafia. Good job if you can get it, being a RINO-- you can gaslight the grey haired old ladies and angry old men seeing their fixed incomes being inflated away by shameless ignorant puppets like Creepy Joe, and never be in a position to change a damn thing!

"Lib -tard" is a word without meaning from an, ah? what? A poster who presents himself as a garbage eater. Garbage in, garbage out.

The so-called "Republican Party" is no longer republican. It is a Trump puppet. I support the Lincoln Project.

That's why you hate Trumpism., or shall we call it "DeSantism?"

DeSantis is not Donald Trump:

Why Never Trumpers Should Bet on DeSantis Now

You know, this is why Democrats can't win. Their house is build on sand, when their agenda is finally recognized by the masses, the masses get out their clubs and pitch forks. November will be a bloodbath, and you only have yourselves to blame. 

But I digress.

Now to your comment vis a vis animals and homosexuality. Perhaps you have a lavender tinge to your own sexuality  and to compare yourself to s chimpanzee makes you feel better about opposing what you imagine as "puritanical sexual morality?"

"Perhaps"?  It could well be so. As soon as I get done sexing up all the buxom wenches/wives, I might try that. I don't see that possibilty ever existing, half the world's population is female.

I used to subscribe to The National Lampoon and as it said the odd missing limb or extra bits don't disqualify any woman from being my 'wife for the night' or twenty minutes in the dark. Suppurating sores are a disqualifier, however.

No one who has lived as long as you and I can say we are ignorant of human sexual choices and yes, " animal instincts" but the problem I see with your point is We are not animals. We are human.

(oops.. You humans are human-- I almost forgot I'm a Great White Shark!) 

Humans are, indeed, animals. Look it up.

You might try to define that difference. Being a secular humanist at heart, you have little time for a religious analysis of what it means to be a "human made in thd image of God" apparently. Most people today have been educated by naturalistic evolutionist propaganda (bad 19th century science) to imagine they are just animals.

I never said humanity was 'just animals'. However, we are animals but very, very unique animals.

So you look down to the animal kingdom as a guide for human behavior. One of the enobling characteristics of Western Civilization was that it's conception of humankind was based on a Creation of an intelligent creator.

Humanity did not create God. Your premise is false.

When God created this world he apparently started with Bacteria ("let there be life") and over the course of a billion years or so, humans emerged from that process. God "created man from the dust of the earth and breathed into him the breath of LIFE, and man BECAME a LIVING SOUL"

that "soul" is eternal, immaterial, and made in the image of its creator. That's what makes you human.

How do you know any of that? What evidence do you have that animals do not have a soul? If you can't prove that, you can't exclude any living thing from incorporating a soul.

Animals are to a degree, sentient beings. Sin and evil are common to humans only, because they often recognize they violate their own higher nature.

Again, how do you know that?

And so, describing sexual immorality of his own time (Romans) Saint Paul recognized that " though they knew God, they worshipped the creature rather than the creator" God gave them over to their unclean lusts. He endorsed human freedom as an extension of His own Divine nature. But humans would rather damage themselves and destroy their own higher natures in order to pursue fleshly pleasures, which in turn leades to greater excesses, until, like Sodom and Gomorrah they reap the fruits of their own perversions,

"their condemnation is just" Paul concluded.

Prove that Saint Paul existed.

Does that mean "God hates f a g s " --as the Crazy Baptist-Okie Cult claims?

On the contrary. Jesus died for all mankind's sin, because

"God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whosoever believed on him should not perish, but have eternal life."

The jury is out concerning Gods finsl judgement of individuals. I am not that judge. But apparently, you humans have a BIG unresolved problem, seen throughout your recorded history, a problem you won't ever solve by modeling the behavior of mere brute animals acting on instinct alone. 

I don't believe that God will condemn any souls, period. The God knows that mankind is flawed, and is capable of infinite mercy and forgiveness.

There is much to humans that involves language and intelligence which is not common to the animals.

If mankind are not animals, what are we? Easy question for a completely detached observer, like a shark. I don't expect much of you, it is a demonstrated fact that sharks will eat anything they can swallow.

Since you Libz aarently want to think you're a bunch of souped-up chimpanzees, you often act that way.. and to comfort yourselves in your sexual ( human ) perversions you NOW insist on brainwashing FIVE year olds?!

Interesting statement. You believe that teaching children of the dangers they may encounter is somehow wrong, sinful.

Jesus, the crucified,  would-be savior of your eternal souls. had no time for what you (and Disney) are presently advocating ..

"If anyone causes any of these little-ones to sin.." ( read brainwashing them into pre-pubecent gender confusion, and maybe making them would-be anchovies on Hillary's Pizza! A pedophile paradise, led by Mickey Mouse himself..)

It would be better for them on the Day of Judgement that they be tossed into the sea with a millstone tied around their neck"

As far as I know, Disney is not advocating homosexuality. Admitting the existence of something is not the same as promoting it, nor is respecting the "right to privacy in bedrooms", as it were. 

Yeah. I'm thinking of all the broken lives, and destroyed health and futures of humans who enter apparenyly "looking down" and serving their animal "instincts" ( actually driven by lower brain functions) rather than "lookin up" to the Creator  and accepting his enlightenment and hope for their personal salvation.

Now, there is some bullsh. YOU have absolutely no idea of my religious opinion.

People like you, who endorse sexual deviance, abortion, eugenics, and The BIG LIE, all hope in vain ( and support your criminally insane politicians) looking for a better world.

You haven't found it yet. "Welcome to the Jungle."

It's very telling that you have to invent stuff to argue your position. Extremely Trumpist.

m>Satan, afterall, was characterized as "the father of lies, and a murder from the beginning"

It isn't "hate" that inspires this present parental rebellion against everything you and the "Woke left" believes and wants to teach our children. Your present foolish fight is not against flesh and blood, but against the Spirit and love of God which you have choosen to reject.

Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

Saint Paul was correct in his analysis of this problem.

Prove that Saint Paul existed. If you can't, the principle you argue is just as unfounded as the principle you say he propagated.

(Wisdom 2000 years old, and counting!) 

Thus Quoth the Whales.

Our Libz are unwittingly, in fact, Satan's Useful idiots! 

Prove that Satan exists. Again, if you can't, you express a dogmatic opinion.

The Bible is not scientifically or historically a factual, credible document. It is a message that each of us interprets in FAITH. Faith is not, and can not be historical, scientifically proven.

P.S. What is a 'lib'? Your posts present them as being people who do not have absolute faith in Trump or his presidency.