Click here to close
New Message Alert
List Entire Thread
Msg ID: 2696282 Biden election win is more and more questionable +1/-3     
Author:Old Guy
7/14/2021 1:32:16 PM

Arizona now making the clam of big election discrepancies.

5 more states looking at doing election audits.

we now know the Justice Department was given orders "not to investigate any fraud cases".

Many of the fraud claims are starting to become investigated.

Many states are now finding more fraud and ballots counted twice.

This is just the start as the truth will come out!

 

 

 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696285 Biden election win is more and more questionable +3/-0     
Author:TheCrow
7/14/2021 1:40:01 PM

Reply to: 2696282

Arizona now making the clam of big election discrepancies.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696286 Biden election win is more and more questionable +3/-0     
Author:TheCrow
7/14/2021 1:40:43 PM

Reply to: 2696285

"Arizona now making the clam of big election discrepancies."

Cit your source.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696288 And the sheep continue on +4/-0     
Author:bladeslap
7/14/2021 1:48:25 PM

Reply to: 2696282

No, it's only you 

Only the extreme alt-right quesiton it

Trump got masacred in a landslide

The "Cyber Ninjas" who have ZERO experience in election recounts, were sent in to do a recount.

Ya okay Old guy

You think you might be coming off a bit foolish?

 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696293 You mean like this? +3/-0     
Author:TheCrow
7/14/2021 3:02:22 PM

Reply to: 2696282

A count that can't be auditted and confirmed, isn't an audit at all. It is a wish and a guess.

I'm guessing that it is illegal for anybody but the election commission to have custody of the ballots. 

 

Senate recount delayed again; Karen Fann says Cyber Ninjas' count of ballots doesn't match county's

Andrew Oxford
Arizona Republic
 
 
 
 
 

The Arizona Senate’s effort to do its own check on the number of ballots cast in Maricopa County’s 2020 general election is not expected to begin until Wednesday in the latest turn for an unprecedented and controversial audit that has dragged on for 12 weeks.

And the recount — which will be the third tally of the ballots — got a new element of drama on Tuesday after Senate President Karen Fann told a radio show host that the companies hired by the Legislature to review the election results had come up with a different number of ballots than Maricopa County officials.

“They haven’t released a number yet. However, we do know those numbers do not match with Maricopa County at this point,” Fann, R-Prescott, told Mike Broomhead on his KTAR program.

Fann said the Senate will count the number of ballots, not how each ballot was voted, to again check how many were cast.

If the third tally produces yet another number, that is likely to only heighten criticism of a process many election officials have maintained is unreliable and open to error.

Outside observers have raised concerns that the processes used by the Senate’s contractors depart entirely from the state’s existing procedures for auditing election results by hand, and critics have questioned the qualifications of the companies.

Observers from the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office reported in June, for example, that they witnessed a table of workers count a stack of ballots. The workers counted 24 ballots while another count had tallied 25 ballots.

“In a credible audit, the batch would have been recounted. Instead, the table manager said she thought she found the 25th ballot stuck to another ballot and proceeded without recounting the batch,” the observers reported.

While counting was supposed to begin Tuesday, spokesman Randy Pullen said officials were still setting up equipment and running tests, which pushed the start of the effort to Wednesday.

 

That coincides with the last day of the Senate’s extended lease on part of the state fairgrounds in Phoenix, where it has stored voters’ 2.1 million ballots.

The Senate moved into an exhibition building at the site earlier this month after using the Veterans Memorial Coliseum since late April but had agreed to vacate the premises entirely by 5 p.m. on July 14.

The Senate purchased counting machines that will run at a rate of about nine minutes per box of ballots. There are 1,681 boxes, although they don't all hold identical numbers of ballots.

Pullen said the Senate was working on an extension of about two weeks.

The Senate did not file an application to use any of the space, overseen by a state board headed by the former chairman of the state Republican Party, but it agreed to pay the actual costs of utilities for the spaces it was using.

Fairgrounds officials said they have not yet billed the Senate for any of its costs.

Contact Andrew Oxford at andrew.oxford@arizonarepublic.com or on Twitter @andrewboxford.

Support local journalism. Subscribe to azcentral.com today.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696294 The sham audit itself is the endgame... It’s what’s keeping Trump’s electi +3/-0     
Author:TheCrow
7/14/2021 3:09:35 PM

Reply to: 2696293

"It’s what’s keeping Trump’s election delusions alive and well; not what will prove or disprove whether the fantasy has merit. The play’s the thing."

Trump is willing to destroy the American election process to achieve and keep personal power. He has made no secret of that for years.

I read TrumpeRINO frog boys claims that "without borders, we have no nation." To that I add, without credible elections, we are not American.

Thank you, Trump and TrumpeRINO frog boys for destroying what Americans have fought and died for since 1776. Long live his imperial majesty,King Donald! And the emperor has no clothes.

 

The Real Point of the Arizona Audit

It’s all a big show.
 
JULY 12, 2021 5:30 AM
Featured Image
The former guy dances as he leaves after speaking during a Make America Great Again rally at Laughlin/Bullhead International Airport October 28, 2020, in Bullhead City, Arizona. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

If you’re waiting to read the Cyber Ninjas’ report about Maricopa County’s election counts to find out what happens next in Donald Trump’s rigged election narrative, don’t bother.

The sham audit itself is the endgame. The audit, which began on April 23, was supposed to end by May 14. Now, nearly two months after blowing past that deadline, a spokesman says people shouldn’t expect anything until August. But, really, who knows when, or if, it all will ever end.

It’s not like anyone in MAGA land is in any hurry to call curtains on the big show. That’s because the performance, as incompetent as it is, is the point. It’s what’s keeping Trump’s election delusions alive and well; not what will prove or disprove whether the fantasy has merit. The play’s the thing.

Besides, haven’t they already won, on some level? It’s not every day a couple of partisans are able to seize millions of ballots and a bunch of expensive election equipment to put on a big, months-long show at the Veterans Memorial Coliseum. Everybody came, too. Politicos, reporters, elected officials. MAGA propagandists are still capitalizing on all the free content. And donations keep pouring into the coffers of Trump-adjacent grifters all around. Why end it now?

The auditors haven’t even drafted a report and already, there’s lots of breathless talk from MAGA land about taking the show on the road to Pennsylvania. The dominos are falling, just as the prophecy foretold!

Arizona GOP Chairwoman Kelli “Stop the Counting” Ward couldn’t be happier. “It is good to know that the Arizona audit is already inspiring others to take important steps to ensure election integrity,” she said in a video on Friday. “Even before its completion, the Arizona audit, America’s audit, is bearing good fruit.”

Joy! The sequel is being planned before the first release even wraps its maiden run! Election Integrity Forever!


There are plenty of financial, legal, and political costs associated with the spectacle, none of which seem to worry the audit’s proponents much. They’re having too much fun.

They’re not concerned about sticking Arizona taxpayers with the bill for voting equipment that will need to be replaced at a yet-to-be-determined cost. They’re not thinking about the implications of using private funds to finance what was billed as a public, government-run enterprise before spiraling into bamboo-sniffing, Cheeto-dust-hunting ridiculousness. The Department of Justice has warned about possible legal exposure that Arizona Republicans have for violating federal laws requiring the preservation of election records. But that hasn’t slowed them down, either.

More than likely, the audit will damage the Republican brand even further in the critical swing state of Arizona, where it lost both its marquee races—the presidency and U.S. Senate—in 2020. A recent Bendixen & Amandi International poll found roughly half of Arizona voters oppose the recount effort and that the “intensity of opposition to the audit exceeded the intensity of support, with those strongly opposed to it outnumbering those strongly in favor by 5 percentage points.”

Considering that Maricopa County delivers about two-thirds of Arizona’s votes, someone ought to start writing a political thriller for 2022. Title it: “Backlash.”


There’s about as much chance of the Arizona audit producing anything that resembles a credible report as there is George Strait selling an oceanfront property there anytime soon.

Karen Fann, the Republican president of the Arizona Senate, who is—as I explained here last week—one of two people solely responsible for the audit, already gave the game away. “Contrary to what you see and what you hear, I have said from Day One, I have never, ever said there was fraud,” she recently told the Arizona Republic. “This was about election integrity.”

Ah, yes. “Election integrity againWhat a magical phrase.

It’s what MAGA lawyers, activists, elected officials, and insurrectionists alike have all used to justify their actions in hopes of overturning the 2020 election. It’s the catch-all code phrase under which all unfounded aspersions about the election are cast without ever producing a shred of evidence to back it up.

Sadly, it ain’t no passing craze. It’s all coming straight from the top, from the man whom Republican party officials still call their leader.

Over the weekend, in press releasesmedia appearances, and a CPAC speech in Texas, Donald Trump continued to spread his election conspiracy theories and engage in January 6 insurrection whitewashing, seeking an audience for his lies wherever he could find one.

Guess where he’s going next.

Arizona. The former president will be in Phoenix on July 24 for an event billed as a “rally to protect our elections.”

The show, you see, must go on. And on. And on.

Image of Amanda Carpenter

Amanda Carpenter

Bulwark political columnist Amanda Carpenter is a CNN contributor, author, and former communications director to Sen. Ted Cruz and speechwriter to Sen. Jim DeMint.


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696295 This is what an actual conservative Republican looks like and says... +2/-0     
Author:TheCrow
7/14/2021 3:13:24 PM

Reply to: 2696293

Instead, we have the "Second Coming", the "Only one who can fix it", the serial liar running the Republican Party into the ground. 

Decency, R.I.P.

If manners are the small change of morality, we’ve gone bankrupt a few cents at a time.
 
JULY 1, 2021 
Featured Image
U.S. Sen. Mitt Romney (Photo by Stefani Reynolds/Getty Images)

Sen. Mitt Romney appeared on Jake Tapper’s CNN show last weekend and for a few brief minutes I felt transported to a saner world. Asked about the gross things some on the right are saying about Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Romney responded that “General Milley is a person of extraordinary accomplishment and personal character and a brilliant man.” Asked about continuing allegations from former President Donald Trump and his enablers that the election was stolen, Romney didn’t hesitate to call it “the big lie.” He added:

Look, the president was saying—was crying foul on election night and actually before election night. And the question is, what were his sources of information? Where did he hear that the election had been fraudulently carried out? Did he hear it from the Justice Department? No. Did he hear it from the intelligence community? No. So, where did he hear it from? The MyPillow guy? Rudy Giuliani?

On substance, Romney was rock solid. He still believes Russia is going to take every opportunity to “poke a stick in our eye” and he worries that China is on track to become “the most powerful economy in the world and the most powerful military in the world.” He opposes government efforts to dictate what is taught in schools. He supports spending $1.2 trillion on roads, bridges, rail, air, water pipes, broadband, and more, but when Tapper noted that the American Society of Civil Engineers estimates that we face an additional $800 billion backlog on infrastructure spending and asked why Romney didn’t “at least meet the demands that these and other experts” were calling for, Romney responded politely but deftly: “Well, I must admit that I do pay a lot of attention to the engineers, but, of course, they’re paid based upon how much we spend in their arena.” Spoken like someone who wasn’t born yesterday.

It went on like that for the whole interview. Romney knew the infrastructure bill in detail. He praised President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken. He differed with Democrats about social spending and taxes. He stated unequivocally that the election was free and fair. In short, he was completely out of step with modern “conservatism” and the Republican party.

Some said that the permanent change Trump would effect in the Republican party would be a heightened attention to the needs of the working class. That may or may not materialize. Some Republicans are making noises about being a “worker’s party,” but there doesn’t appear to be anything concrete there yet.

No, the biggest post-Trump change is the eager embrace of indecency. On his Fox show, Tucker Carlson played a clip of Gen. Milley explaining that he thinks it’s important to hear various points of view (even critical race theory). At the conclusion of the clip, Carlson spat, “He’s not just a pig, he’s stupid!”

Leave aside the fact that an entitled, trust-funded scion of the Swanson frozen-dinner fortune who was thrown out of a Swiss boarding school and managed to attain a B.A. at Trinity College is daring to call Milley (Princeton, B.A.; Columbia, M.A.; Naval War College, M.A.) “stupid,” and just focus on the glaring social transgression. The host of a widely viewed TV show should be, if not a model of decorum, at least not a foam-flecked fulminator. That’s part of what it means to live in a civilized society. And certainly a much-decorated general, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is entitled to respect for his service to the country. Every member of the military deserves to be honored for their service. Or, if that’s too much to manage, how about not grossly insulted? And this from a self-styled conservative? Didn’t conservatives once fume about someone in the Clinton White House saying something disrespectful to an officer? Didn’t they mock Obama over a coffee-cup salute?

The 2021 conservatives clearly don’t respect the military or the police (see January 6) if it’s inconvenient. While dissing decorated officers, these new conservatives eagerly embrace war criminals. Fox News has campaigned on their behalf, and Trump pardoned several. When Trump suggested targeting the children of terrorists, or told police to rough up suspects, or denied raping a woman because “she’s not my type,” or intimated that a deceased Democratic politician was in hell, Republicans nodded along.

Nikki Haley, who once calculated that the best path to political prominence in the GOP was to remove the Confederate flag from the South Carolina capitol grounds following the brutal massacre of African-American churchgoers, has now figured out that basic decency is the road to irrelevance. In 2015, she explained movingly that while she knew that many non-racists in South Carolina saw the flag as a symbol of tradition, the feelings of others, for whom “the flag is a deeply offensive symbol of a brutally oppressive past” had to take precedence. And so, she concluded, 150 years after the conclusion of the Civil War (but only 54 years after the flag was first raised there), the “time has come” to remove it.

No more of that. Campaigning in Iowa recently, she told the audience that “Republicans are too nice. I wear heels. It’s not for a fashion statement. I use them for kicking. But I always kick with a smile.” We get it. She’s after the “She Fights” slogan. Haley has probably set some sort of record for flushing her own dignity down the toilet in record time. She’s sensing the mood of the Republican base. It’s ugly, so she’s diving in.

Do you remember—eons or five years ago—when it was considered beneath contempt to attack a politician’s family? Bring the heat for the man in the arena, but by all that is holy, leave his wife and kids out of it? It seems antique now. When one of the Biden family dogs passed away a couple of weeks ago, a National Review writer tweeted, “Champ Dies. Major lives on. The Biden family tragedy in miniature.”

Mocking a family when they’ve lost a beloved pet, which was the way some on Twitter interpreted this, would have been tasteless and cruel. But this was much more sinister. The implication was that Biden’s “good son,” Beau, had died while his brother Hunter lived on. Who does that? And especially those who call themselves conservative and constantly rant about threats to civilization. How can they not see that undermining basic civility and decency is itself an attack on civilization?

Well, at least we have Romney, and a few more, to remind Republicans of what they once were and could be again.

Image of Mona Charen

Mona Charen

Mona Charen is Policy Editor of The Bulwark, a nationally syndicated columnist, and host of The Bulwark’s Beg to Differ podcast. She can be reached at monacharen@thebulwark.com.


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696298 You mean like this? +2/-3     
Author:Old Guy
7/14/2021 3:58:50 PM

Reply to: 2696293

Yes! There are issues, and it is the time for NO more political BS.  Here we have an audit, that comes up with  17.5 percent of the ballots missing.  More vote total than real votes!  And what do you guys claim, they were biased. BS!  This country must have honest elections or we have NO country.  It is a shame that it went this far, both sides should have worked to correct it a long time ago.  I am afraid if this does not get corrected with the "truth" this will end this great nation.  More than one state is discussing leaving the states, military groups are growing.  Someone needs to be honest and answer the election issues.

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/arizona-senate-audit-2020/2021/07/14/id/1028566/

 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696334 "You mean like this?" 10 months after the election? 17.5% of ballots missi +3/-0     
Author:TheCrow
7/14/2021 8:37:27 PM

Reply to: 2696298

10 months after the election?  17.5% of ballots missing? Nobody noticed except Trump and Newsmax? Both famously untrustworthy. They don't need an audit, they need to start arresting people,

Bur it didn't happen. The election board and the audit didn't notice the discrepancy. Only the "Chosen One" did. And he wasn't in Maricopa County.

A self-interested liar and a biased news source.

 

Newsmax Bias and Credibility

Last updated on July 3rd, 2021 at 09:34 am

Newsmax - Right Bias - Questionable Conservative - Republican - Libertarian - Not Credible - Fake NewsFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

 
  • We rate Newsmax Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience as well as numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report

Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Fake News, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: TV Station
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Newsmax is an American conservative biased news and opinion website founded by Christopher Ruddy in 1998 and based in West Palm Beach, Florida. Christopher Ruddy is the president and CEO of Newsmax Media. According to an Atlantic article, Ruddy is also a close friend of Donald Trump. The website is divided into four main sections: Newsmax, Newsmax Health, Newsmax Finance, and Newsmax World, divided into various subsections.  Newsmax Media also operates a print magazine called Newsmax and the cable news channel Newsmax TV.

On 4/30/2021, Newsmax apologized to Dominion Voting Systems for claims that they manipulated voting machines and counts to thwart the re-election of President Donald Trump. The statement reads, “Newsmax has found no evidence that Dr. Coomer interfered with Dominion voting machines or voting software in any way, nor that Dr. Coomer ever claimed to have done so,” it said in a statement. “Nor has Newsmax found any evidence that Dr. Coomer ever participated in any conversation with members of ‘Antifa,’ nor that he was directly involved with any partisan political organization.”

Through this apology, Dominion Voting Systems dropped the defamation lawsuit against Newsmax.

Funded by / Ownership

Newsmax is owned by Christopher Ruddy, who is the CEO of Newsmax Media. Newsmax is funded through advertising and via a paid subscription to their platinum plan, allowing more access to content.

Analysis / Bias

Newsmax has a category on their sidebar called Around the Web, which is deceptive advertising. It looks like news links and leads to fake pseudo-science information and products. For example: “Suffer with Low Energy, Weight Gain & Fatigue” leads to a new website promoting products. In another category called Specials, they publish news with sensational headlines resulting in headlines such as these: “Nobel Prize-Winning Discovery Makes Your Cells Nearly “Immortal” SPECIAL: New way to grow biologically younger,“ which again leads to an advertisement.

When reporting real news, Newsmax uses minimally loaded words in their headlines and articles such as “NYT: Growing Puerto Rican Population Could Offset GOP Cubans” and moderately loaded: “FEMA’s Long: No Time For San Juan Mayor’s ‘Political Noise.’ Newsmax also aggregates news stories from credible sources such as Reuters and the AP.  Newsmax holds a strong right editorial bias. The majority of editorials favor conservatives, such as “Could Google Lose the Left?” which first appeared in the right biased Conservative Review.

 

Newsmax does not always align with experts’ consensus in the given field when it comes to science. For example, they often promote “no global warming,” which is simply untrue. Further, they have promoted misinformation regarding vaccines’ safetychemtrailsCoronaVirus conspiracies, and unproven 2020 election fraud disinformation. In general, Newsmax is not a credible source that holds a strong right-leaning editorial bias.

 

Failed Fact Checks

We rate Newsmax Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience as well as numerous failed fact checks. (M. Huitsing 10/8/2017) Updated (05/01/2021)

Source: https://www.newsmax.com/



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696357 Really! +0/-3     
Author:Old Guy
7/14/2021 10:35:31 PM

Reply to: 2696334

Your source has a worst credibility problem than NewsMax.

What are you going to do or say when Arizona officially releases the report?

What are you going to do or say when we all understand Biden did not win?

what side are you going to be own, justice and truth or the current dictator?

 

 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696359 It's OVER - Still sore Trump lost? +3/-1     
Author:bladeslap
7/14/2021 10:37:05 PM

Reply to: 2696357

Old Guy,

You're going to go to your grave trying to pass on the big lie

IT'S OVER

Trump got beaten fair and square.

Time to move on...Seriously

Are you also an anti-vaxxer



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696363 Keep believing, inside you know you are wrong! (NT) +2/-3     
Author:Old Guy
7/14/2021 10:41:04 PM

Reply to: 2696359


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696405 Cyber Ninjas to the rescue? +3/-0     
Author:bladeslap
7/15/2021 9:35:01 AM

Reply to: 2696363

You realize that you throw out every piece of evidence that shows Trump got his head handed to him and you grasp onto thinks like "Cyber Ninjas" - 

Old guy, you were wrong. HE LOST

Get over it and move on. You'll feel better.

 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696469 What are you going to do or say when Arizona officially releases the repor +3/-0     
Author:TheCrow
7/15/2021 1:52:11 PM

Reply to: 2696357

"What are you going to do or say when Arizona officially releases the report?"

Good riddance to bad trash. Trump's political career is built entirely on self-centered, self-promoting slamming of anybody and everybody. He's vindictive narcissistic insecure liar. He's never organized or worked with a team.

Biden won BIG. He won a majority of the popular ballot by a 4.45% margin compared to Trump's loss of the  2016 popular ballot by 2.09%.

Arizona won't upset the 2020 election in any way. That wasn't Trump's intention. He is undermining the election process, discreditting elections in the eyes of the American people. 

Waht is it frog boys say all the time? Without borders we aren't a nation? Well, without elections, we don't have 'America'.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696493 Poll: Arizonans don’t want to re-elect Biden, but will support him over Tru +2/-0     
Author:TheCrow
7/15/2021 3:44:46 PM

Reply to: 2696282

 

Poll: Arizonans don’t want to re-elect Biden, but will support him over Trump

June 29, 2021

Last Updated: June 30, 2021 8:54 am
 
U.S. President Donald Trump and former Vice President and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden speak during the first presidential debate at the Health Education Campus of Case Western Reserve University on Sept. 29, 2020 in Cleveland, Ohio. Photo by Morry Gash-Pool | Getty Images

Arizonans don’t want to re-elect President Joe Biden to another term in 2024, but will again give the state’s 11 electoral votes to him if he’s running against Donald Trump, according to a poll released Tuesday.

And U.S. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema has better job approval ratings from Republican voters than from her fellow Democrats, who are riled up over her support for the filibuster and other positions that are anathema to Democratic voters.

The poll by Bendixen and Amandi International, a Democratic polling firm based in Miami, was first reported by Politico on Tuesday morning. 

The live-caller survey queried 600 Arizonans on Biden, Sinema, U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly, Gov. Doug Ducey, the elimination of the filibuster and the controversial self-styled audit that the Arizona Senate ordered of the 2020 general election in Maricopa County. The poll has an error rate of +/- 4 percentage points.

Biden won Arizona by just 10,457 votes in November, becoming the first Democrat to win the traditionally red state since 1996, and only the second since 1948. Only 37% of respondents said Biden deserved to be re-elected based on his job performance so far, compared to 53% who said he doesn’t deserve another term. Forty-nine percent had a favorable review of Biden and 48% had an unfavorable view.

But Biden’s prospects brightened significantly when respondents were asked about a head-to-head matchup against Trump. In a hypothetical matchup between Biden and Trump, the incumbent president bested his predecessor 51-44, with independent voters breaking 54-41 in favor of Biden. Only 46% of the voters polled said they had a favorable opinion of Trump compared to 51% who had an unfavorable opinion. Among independents, 58% had an unfavorable view of Trump.

Sinema, who has repeatedly angered Democratic voters over the past few years, had 50% of respondents say they had a favorable opinion of her and her job performance. Only 52% of her fellow Democrats said they had a favorable view of her, while 51% of Republican respondents also had a favorable opinion.

When it came to Sinema’s job performance, Republicans were actually more supportive than Democrats: 54% of Republican respondents and 47% of Democratic respondents said they approved of the way she handled her job in the Senate, while independents broke 46-40 in favor of her job performance.

Sinema’s opposition to eliminating the filibuster, which has largely blocked Biden and Senate Democrats from advancing their agenda since retaking control of the chamber, has angered Democratic voters perhaps more than anything else the senior senator has done. But only 36% of respondents said they disapproved of the filibuster, compared to 46% who supported it.

When the pollster explained that the 60-vote threshold needed to overcome the filibuster is a hindrance to Biden and Senate Democrats, support actually jumped to 50%, with opposition increasing to 39%.

Kelly, who is up for re-election next year, has similar overall approval numbers to Sinema, but far more support among his fellow Democrats and far less from Republicans. Among Democratic respondents, 87% said they approved of his job performance compared to 19% of Republicans. Independents supported his job performance 44-31. Overall, 51% of respondents approved of Kelly’s job performance and 35% opposed as he heads into his re-election.

One issue that could affect how people vote in next year’s election is the controversial review of the 2020 election results in Maricopa, which Senate President Karen Fann ordered in response to widespread but baseless allegations that the election was rigged against Trump. As in other recent polls, respondents largely were not supportive of the audit. 

More respondents (49%) said they opposed the audit than supported it (46%), and support followed predictably partisan trends, with Democrats overwhelmly opposed and Republicans overwhelmingly supportive. Among independents, 56% opposed the audit and 38% supported it.

The audit’s approval numbers worsened after the pollster provided more information. After being informed that the review was being conducted by companies with no experience in election audits, that the lead contractor believes that the election was rigged, that election experts and some Republican officials opposed it, and that previous reviews have already found no problems with the election, 51% said they opposed it compared to 44% who supported it, with opposition among independents jumping to 59%.

Nearly half of the voters surveyed — 46%, including 46% of independents — said they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who supported the audit, while 37% of total respondents and 28% of independents said they would be more likely to support a pro-audit candidate. 

But among Republicans, support for the audit was high, creating a conundrum for GOP candidates who face serious challenges in both the primary and general elections. Republican respondents supported the audit by a margin of 75-19. Support dropped slightly to 73-21 after respondents learned about the many problems that have plagued the election review.

The pollster also surveyed respondents on their opinions of Ducey, who will leave office after 2022. Ducey’s favorability numbers were slightly underwater, with 49% saying they had an unfavorable view of him and 47% saying they had a favorable opinion.

Of the poll’s 600 respondents, 40% were Republicans, 36% were Democrats and 24% were independents or others, such as Libertarians. Compared to the past few election cycles, the poll slightly oversampled Democrats and undersampled independents. Democrats made up nearly 33% of the vote in 2020 and independents made up nearly 30%, while Republicans were nearly 38% of the vote in the general election.

 

Associate Editor Jeremy Duda is a Phoenix native and began his career in journalism in 2003 after graduating from the University of Arizona. Prior to joining the Arizona Mirror, he worked at the Arizona Capitol Times, where he spent eight years covering the Governor's Office and two years as editor of the Yellow Sheet Report. Before that, he wrote for the Hobbs News-Sun of Hobbs, NM, and the Daily Herald of Provo, Utah. Jeremy is also the author of the history book “If This Be Treason: the American Rogues and Rebels Who Walked the Line Between Dissent and Betrayal.”


Return-To-Index