Click here to close
New Message Alert
List Entire Thread
Msg ID: 2696952 Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral f +3/-0     
Author:TheCrow
7/19/2021 12:36:47 PM
EVERYTHINGNEWS iv class="ArticleHeader-date-line-3oc3Y">FEBRUARY 15, 202110:41 AMUPDATED 5 MONTHS AGO

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President Donald Trump and his allies challenging the election or its outcome.

 
Reuters Fact Check. REUTERS

The post, which can be seen  here  , perpetuates the false narrative that there was widespread voter fraud during the 2020 presidential election ( here ). U.S. election security officials have said the election was “the most secure in American history” ( here , here ).

In the early morning of Jan. 7, hours after Trump supporters stormed the Capitol, the U.S. Congress certified enough Electoral College votes for President Biden to declare him winner of the election ( here ).  

As reported by Reuters   here  , state and federal judges - some appointed by Trump - dismissed more than 50 lawsuits brought by Trump or his allies alleging election fraud and other irregularities.

Independent experts, governors and state election officials from both parties say there was no evidence of widespread fraud.

According to the Washington Post   here  , instead of alleging “widespread fraud or election-changing conspiracy” the lawsuits pushed by Trump’s team and allies focused on smaller complaints, which were largely dismissed by judges due to a lack of evidence. “The Republicans did not provide evidence to back up their assertions — just speculation, rumors or hearsay.”

On Nov 27, 2020 a federal appeals court rejected a Trump campaign proposal to block Biden from being declared the winner of Pennsylvania. ( here ). At the time, Stephanos Bibas, on behalf of the three-judge panel wrote: “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so." It added: “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."

Similarly, on Dec. 12, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a long-shot lawsuit by the state of Texas and backed by Trump, which sought to throw out voting results in four states ( here ). In a brief order, the justices said Texas did not have legal standing to bring the case. 

On Dec. 1, then-Attorney General William Barr said that the Justice Department had found no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the election, even as President Trump kept up his legal efforts to reverse his defeat ( here ). Two weeks later, Barr announced his resignation from the Trump administration ( here ).

Reuters Fact Check has debunked a series of similar false claims of election fraud. Some can be seen  here  ,   here  ,   here  ,  here  ,  here  .

VERDICT

False. Courts dismissed more than 50 lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud and irregularities presented by Trump and allies. U.S. election security officials have said the election was “the most secure in American history”.

This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checking work here  .

Our Standards: The Thomson Reute



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696955 Your fact check is incorrect, a lie! +0/-3     
Author:Old Guy
7/19/2021 1:00:23 PM

Reply to: 2696952

Only one of the cases referenced in the post had anything to do with fraud.  The other reference material had other issues.  How can a fact check make a claim when it uses references related to other issues.  This fact check is a lie.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696957 Your word against Reuters? Let's see- you or Reuters? Difficult decision? +3/-0     
Author:TheCrow
7/19/2021 1:13:07 PM

Reply to: 2696955

You, who believe the serial liar Donald Trump or Reuters, who have been reporting since 1851....



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696959 Read the damn link +0/-3     
Author:Old Guy
7/19/2021 1:33:47 PM

Reply to: 2696957

Reuters used information to make  the case that courts dismissed multiple lawsuits alleging fraud with  cases not about election fraud.  Example the Supreme courtcase was about violation of the constitution, not fraud.  Yet, Reuters listed it as proof.  
They even used what Barr said about it on Dec 3, that he found no evidence.  What Barr said is NOT A COURT CASE.  How can they make a claim about court cases without using court cases as references.  Besides that Barr does not know, he already admitted he did not investigate it.

If Reuters would have said " many people believe that there was no election fraud ". Then that's is the truth, but the claim they make is not even supported with the references they used.

useful idiot 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696980 Apparently you cannot read +3/-0     
Author:bladeslap
7/19/2021 5:32:47 PM

Reply to: 2696959

"As reported by Reuters   here  , state and federal judges - some appointed by Trump - dismissed more than 50 lawsuits brought by Trump or his allies alleging election fraud and other irregularities."

Read, then criticize 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2696987 Read it again, it is biased and misleading  +1/-3     
Author:Old Guy
7/19/2021 6:18:17 PM

Reply to: 2696980

Example:  it has this statement about court cases " judges have dismissed more than 50 lawsuits alleging fraud and other irregularities".  I would not call that a direct lie, just extremely missleading.  What! One suit about fraud and the others about irregularities!



Return-To-Index