or simply just don't know.

You have accused every conservative here of posting inaccurate information.

But from what I've seen, it's you tht are doing just that.

Your sources are inaccurate and very bias. So they are not valid.

Hope that helps you in the future when you think about posting irrelevent, and inaccurate garbage

Dear Observer,

I'm always willing to engage in a meaningful conversation with you. So with that, if you could, perhaps now and in the future, point out the article you found the inaccuracy with and then point to a source that disproves it, I'd be happy to see if what i posted was incorrect; anytihng is possible.

Thanks Obsy

But I will say it is much more difficult for Americans to find information on the internet as most of it is blocked.

So that's why many times I do not post sources.

And also because I'm not exactly internet savy. lol

You got that right,

To find information for the right side can be difficult.  You can type in "Biden is a fool" and with most research engines you will come up with something bad about Trump.

Even the fact cheackers are out of line.  In the law suit against Facebook, Facebook has omitted in court that the fact checks are just "opinions ".  So if you reference a fact check in your post you are just referencing someone else's opinion.

But data is out there to find, good luck!

Posting back with Bladeslap you will find he replies, maybe once, but as soon as you post and prove him wrong he avoids the post, does not reply anymore.  And he will lie through out his post with NO verbage as to why he is correct, just he's correct you are then called a name.

"You can type in "Biden is a fool" and with most research engines you will come up with something bad about Trump."

Uh, no. Typical Trumpist QAnon paranoia. Substitute 'libs' for 'jews' and vice versa, and you are a Hitlerite bent on returning the Third Reich to it's deserved glory:

 In the law suit against Facebook, Facebook has omitted in court that the fact checks are just "opinions ".

Yeah, Facebook. That's where everybody goes for news, right? Nobody with 2 cents of knowledge has a facebook account, much less considers it a news site. Zuckerburg is a crooked jerk, has always been.

They are no different than all the other liberal fact checkers.

Too funny, that made my day, lol

Why is it that ALL the fact checkers are liberal? Is it possible they are actually correct and it's just not what you want to hear?

"Why is it that ALL the fact checkers are liberal? Is it possible they are actually correct and it's just not what you want to hear?"

Because Trumpism is anti-intilectual and anti-science. There is precedent.

You remind me of jettsheep and the Virginia elections.

When you liberals got your asses handed to you, jettsheep's reply was, "WE EXPECTED THAT".!!!

BULL SH !T, this is what you libs do. When you lose , you can't except defeat (Stacy Abrams), and then you deflect by trying to back pedal from your original stance.

This is why you're party is deteriorating.

The mid terms will be an epic victory if we can keep the democratic cheating at bay. 

I have doubts about Murphy winning in your state mod. But that ship has sailed. Jersey deserves that idiot. People are leaving that state in record numbers.

Unfortuneatly, they are coming down here where life is normal. Where the constitution means something.

She's from down there...

Old guy,

If you want to prove an argument wrong, take the intellecutal energy to research it and post proof. Saying that the search engines don't have it might mean that it simply doesn't exist. Just saying someone is wrong doesn't really cut it.

You and I won't agree on everything, but we can agree on giving eachother something subnstantive that is verifiable. 

If you agree to do that with me, I will always do that with you as well.

What kind of information is blocked? 

I make an effort to post coroborating evidence any time I make a statement or quote someone. You accused me of lying, yet you 

1. Will not post a rebuttal or a link to show that I may have gotten it wrong

2. You are assuming I know that something I'm posting is incorrect

I'm a man of my word, and if I post something that is factually wrong, I will man up and admit it. 

Well, I guess I haven't seen that happen yet.

The Kavanaugh hearings come to mind. Just to mention one instance

However, I will try to insert some sources when I can. Some of what I post I hear on talk shows which makes it difficult to back up.

But let's face it mod, there are many times when you know the posting is accurate and you dismiss it. When a posting doesn't support your belief, you go into auto mode.

That's my observation