| Msg ID: 2724040 |
Another democratic gem waiting in the wings +1/-2
|
| Author:observer II
3/24/2022 2:31:00 PM |
Judge Jackson is yet another poor choice by the biden administration. This woman was asked what the definition of a woman is. AND SHE COULDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION. I'm telling you, this party is like watching an episode of Benny Hill. You guys are the greatest form of entertainment. Do I hear a thumbs up?????????????? |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2724058 |
Another democratic gem waiting in the wings +0/-2
|
| Author:Old Guy
3/24/2022 6:16:12 PM Reply to: 2724040 |
During questioning it was proven that she is a judge that disregards the written law. |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2725065 |
She is soft on pedophiles, just what we need +0/-2
|
| Author:observer II
4/4/2022 8:21:54 AM Reply to: 2724040 |
The jettsheep's of the world are celebrating this nominee. Another liberal judge that doesn't know how to interpret the law Which makes her unqualified by even the smallest standards Which makes her the perfect lib |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2725080 |
Not guillotining the convicted in the courtroom upon conviction is 'soft'? +2/-0
|
| Author:TheCrow
4/4/2022 11:58:14 AM Reply to: 2725065 |
Perhaps Judge Jackson had a rational for not imposing the max possible sentencing? I guess you're convinced that everybody arrested is equally guilty, lynch them immediately? |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2725084 |
A bullet is too good for ‘em! +1/-2
|
| Author:Shooting Shark
4/4/2022 12:24:54 PM Reply to: 2725080 |
"we found a handkerchief that seems pizza-related." Is it yours Crowbot? This "judge" has averaged awarding 1/3 of the federal sentening guidelines for possession and distribution of child pornography. No wonder Crerpy Joe nominated her. Washington needs a good flushing and it will be down the drain with all your perverted leaders what you you do then? Ps --What exactly is a "hankerchief that seems pizza related?" Please tell us Crowbot.
|
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2725152 |
A bullet is too good for ‘em! +1/-0
|
| Author:TheCrow
4/5/2022 2:21:16 PM Reply to: 2725084 |
"Washington needs a good flushing" I guess you supported Rand Paul? Or other third party, independent candidates? NO? Interesting but not surprising. Trump is farcical in his denuciation of Party Poitics and elected representatives, especially damning if anybody suggest that there is a better way of doing things than the Donald's way. But, you are right "Washington needs a good flushing" All my political contributions go independents. I met Rand Paul.... |
 |
Return-To-Index |
