Could this possibly get any worse.

Let me ask you all this one question.

As a parent, would you knowingly send your children to a school that is teaching very detailed sexual behaviors to your 8 year old child?

Do you think this is a good thing?

New Jersey to require 2nd graders learn about gender identity in fall, alarming parents (yahoo.com)

New Jersey to require 2nd graders learn about gender identity in fall, alarming parents | Fox News

New Jersey’s New Sex Ed Guidelines Teach First and Second Graders about Gender Identity and Abortion - The Tatum Report

New Jersey to require 2nd graders learn about gender identity in fall | Deep blue New Jersey and their teachers are about to go full groomer in the coming fall session. Second graders in New Jersey will be learning about “gender identity” coming this fall. That means seven year old kids will be learning ‘You might feel like you’re a boy even if you have body parts that (ussanews.com)

'I am appalled': First, second graders in NJ to receive sexually explicit 'gender identity' instruction (bizpacreview.com)

Perhaps some knowlefe of the PROPOSED syllabus would be useful? Or, does your intolerant right-wing extremist, puritanical philsophy oppose knowledge?

The students you're dismissing are cerainly aware of sexuality and are exploring it, mostly in inept and ignorant.

Sexuality in all it's varied expression is universal in all animals. But in humans sexuality is sinful?

2nd graders know nothing about sexual deviancy. 

Heck, they don't even recognize color.

They see fellow kids as playmates, buddies, and nothing more.

You obviously don't have kids.

What they are trying to expose these kids to is disgusting. You should all be ashamed

"2nd graders know nothing about sexual deviancy."

You live in cloud cuckoo land. The namecalling, prejudice is THERE- queer, homo, sissy is coomon in the age age group.

Would you willingly allow one of your kids to be exposed and taught about the "HOW TO'S" to anal sex, gender changing, and oral sex????

To a grade school child

Simple question 

You simply choose not to because it would tell people that you think these liberal ideals are simply disgusting and destroying our youth.

Not that I expected anything different, but it tells me you aren't a parent.

Which again is your choice

The eldest dropped out of high school after his mother kicked my out. He is now an IT professional, managing an IT department.

The second oldest married well, has 3 children.

In my start over family, we have a son who is dedicate to his job and education, works and goes to school. Honest, forthright and diligent.

I guess it takes me back when you defend what the liberals are  trying to do with our young children.

They are innocent children that do not need to be taught anything that remotely resemblies what they are reviewing in New  Jersey right now.

Why do the liberals feel the need to rear our children and mold them to their liking, rather than allowing the parents to parent?

Teachers / professors should keep their own personal beliefs to themselves. They shoud focus on the ciriculum they are being paid to teach.

This is exactly why Youngkin won in VA. The former administration felt they had the right to teach the kids whatever they deemed fit. And also felt the parents had no say in their childs education, and the content of that education. Big mistake

Many children are exposed early on in their homes to racial and homophobic rhetoric. Children need to learn early on to respect all people, skin color, sexual orientation, and the like don't matter, all people are God's children. 

We have four children also, all are grown now and have families of their own. None are racists, none are homophobics, because they were raised to respect all people. 

I sure as hell wouldn't want my children taught by the likes of Obsy or Sharky and their lesson plan. Parents should be involved in their children's education, but there needs to be an established curriculum by the education experts. 

 Obsy, you operate at about the same level as Margie Greene...  

I agree children that "... should be taught the truth..." Not your "truth" but the truth. Fact and truth is that there are variations in sexual expressions. They are not 'wrong' as long as nobody is hurt by it. Two (or more) adults should be able to express and fulfil their desires in privacy. As that is the truth, shouldn't that fact be the basis of any instruction?

If that expression is being taught, what should be excluded? Foot fetishes? Golden showers? As you say "... all people are God's children." 

I like buxom wenches- am I a prevert?

I don't think we should be teaching children about sexual positions or assorted sexual acts, so no foot fetishes or golden showers.

What I'm talking about is teaching children that there are heterosexual people, gay people, and transgendered people. All are perfectly fine they are just different. That is The Truth, not "My Truth".  

"There is only one truth..." No, there are MANY truths based on how one interprets the facts.

Where are, what syllabus advocates "teaching children about sexual positions or assorted sexual acts, so no foot fetishes or golden showers."

Informing children that various sexualities exist is not the same as "teaching children about sexual positions or assorted sexual acts, so no foot fetishes or golden showers." Major predators exist that can and do eat people, some are at the top of their food chain. Knowing that is not the same as persuading people to take one home.