Click here to close
New Message Alert
List Entire Thread
Msg ID: 2727105 Why is Ronnie D Insanities attacking Disney? +3/-2     
Author:Jett
4/20/2022 6:54:12 PM

Just because they didn't like his lame "Don't say Gay" law or more publicity?

For some stupid reason conservatives want to hide the truth from children, which is the exact opposite of what they should be doing. 

Teach children the truth, there are Heterosexual, Gay, and Transgendered people in the world, respect them all, people are just different.

  



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727117 Have you lost all common sense  +1/-2     
Author:Old Guy
4/20/2022 10:28:04 PM

Reply to: 2727105

They are just kids! At that age my kid thought he was Spider-Man.  Let them be kids!

 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727125 yes, common sense +2/-1     
Author:bladeslap
4/21/2022 7:25:18 AM

Reply to: 2727117

Common sense says that kids should learn about their surroundings and what it means; just hide the truth from them forever and we'll continue to have more Matthew Shepard incidents. You're okay with that?



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727141 Bladeslap, really +2/-2     
Author:Old Guy
4/21/2022 11:07:38 AM

Reply to: 2727125

You support this crap? I considered you more of a human.

The law only restricts the schools from teaching about sexual orientation and gender issues for kindergarten to 3rd grade.  Do you want your children that young getting those kind of lessons.  If you believe kids that young should be learning such stuff, then you are sick!  

 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727147 Old Dude, what you fail to take into consideration is... +3/-1     
Author:Jett
4/21/2022 12:42:35 PM

Reply to: 2727141

These children are in many cases already being indoctrinated with hate in their homes. Especially in the red states there are huge amounts of children being raised in racist and/or homophobic homes.

It's very important for children to be taught that this is unacceptable behavior, all people should be treated with respect. Recognize and accept that people are different and that's just fine.

I don't know how your children were raised Old Dude, but when you read posts from the likes of Obsy and Sharky you know that the children raised in those homes were not taught about acceptance and tolerance. In fact they were probably exposed to racist and homophobic rants and name calling by their parents and others.

As a society we must tamp down hate, not encourage it. I in no way support teaching young children about sexual acts, but I do support teaching them that all people are God's children and deserve respect. It's the responsibility of our educators to to teach children that in some cases their parents are simply wrong about these issues. Little Johnny's parents may be ranting racists and/or homophobics, but if they are they are wrong, and someone has to tell little Johnny that...       



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727154 Jetsheep, you’re as wrong as two boys f—in +4/-5     
Author:Shooting Shark
4/21/2022 1:31:30 PM

Reply to: 2727147

As always you reveal your mind controlled ignorance ..

smokin dope and "living in a bowl of blueberries"

You mischaracterized the issue, Jetsheep. 

I remember being 5-8 years old.
I had no clue about human sexuality and didn't need one

certainly not from school. 
I heard about the birds and bees from a couple of my buddies at 11 or so 

( really? My mother and dad do that?) 

I remember my friend had an older brother who had been in Vietnam.
I remember listening to "sunshine of your love" (Creme) and looking at his brothers Playboy collection.

( they didn't show pubic hair back then.)

I watched "I Dream of Jennie" because it was funny. Later I learned to love that show for other reasons.

(Barbara Eden remains the hottest woman on the planet (1966)

And in 1969 Anthony Nelson drove a Blue 69 Pontiac Bonneville Convertable just like the one I'm restoring today) 

But I digress. 

Since the dawn of man kids have figured out what to do vis a vis sex. Only since recently was it ok to wear a dress if you're a man who actually believed he was a woman. We had better specific terminology when I was a kid.. "transvestite" and "Homosexual" fit the bill. That sort of thing existed of course, Lou Reed (Transformer) "take a walk on the wild side" and the sad story of Reeds involvement with Andy Warhol's avant garde film troupe ( composed mostly of NYC drug afflicts, transvestites, and male prostitutes.) The Velvet Underground played to a nich underground. 

Meanwhile I was a teenager by then, getting sone practical training in the backseat of my 69 Dodge Superbee with my HS girlfriend

(Neither of us had any "gender confusion issues" as I recall..Thank God I used condoms and she never got pregnant.. I didn't need a School Teacher to tell me that either! Common sense and a natural adolescent development.) 

Then AIDS hit the streets back in 1980 or so. Married with a family by then, not a personal risk despite DR FAUCI ( yes the same one) telling us it was EVERYONES problem. Millions will die! 
(so much for the "Disco Era"-- and suddenly Donna Summer wantin some " Hot love, baby this evening" just wasn't cool anymore!)

Turns out FAUCI lied back then.. AIDS is predominantly a plague of promiscuous male homosexuals. 40 years of fact, you can't spin it Jetsheep! 

Of course it became the political thing on the left to deny reality, as always. Everyone wore pink ribbons for AIDS awareness and male homos were dropping like flies. "Safe sex" and various masterbatory techniques became subjects for public schools,  behind the backs of clueless parents in blue states like Massachusetts.

And Nixon held a commission to investigate the harmfulness of "Porn"

(he found it harmless!!.. he also signed the Roe Vs Wade law legalizing abortion. Targeting blacks specifically, from his recorded comments at the time) 

Reagan later held a porn commission (The Meese Commission ) which determined Pornography to be very harmful to its viewers. Porn Addiction was first recognized, as varieties of porn flourished-- today over 500 specific categories

(ie. "Gay black midgets into S&M who like to torture white women) 

Hmmm. Think Reagan was correct.. long before Hillary and Podesta gave a whole new meaning to 

"Pizza" 

Enough of dragging your "adult" mind through the swamp of the larger landscape of American sexual devience, circa 1960-present) 

You Libs have lost your minds, being weened on porn and gay activism,

The next horizon for the destroyers of American decency on the left appears to be peadopjillia and transgender myth. 

Wheither you like it or not, Jetsheep, parents will not allow schools to re-educate their kids, when society is full of perverse sexual messages. Most people understand sexual devience exists ( as it always has) and would educate their kids themselves.

Ive personally raised two generations of kids, and they aren't "homophobic" or " filled with hate"

but they are not willing to accept your mindless leftist indoctrination of THEIR children.

It's sad really,

you Libz are so blind you really can't accept personal freedom-or parental responsibility

you're such slaves to your own perverse pet proclivities 

( that dress you're wearing makes your ass look fat, Jetsheep!)

Useful Idiots!!

 

 

 

 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727170 Pooty- why is it EVERY sexual animal displays homosexuality if it isn't  +3/-0     
Author:TheCrow
4/21/2022 4:17:15 PM

Reply to: 2727154

Pooty- why is it EVERY sexual animal displays homosexuality if it isn't natural?

EVERY sexual animal! They often stick with their same sex partners exclusively.

Why would a rational, sentient human choose a same sex partner if it wasn't a strong natural instinct?

It doesn't seem to matter how prohibitive your cultural norms are, even if the punishment is death, the relationships are there.

Dude, you were backward if you didn't know there was a difference between boys and girls. My age cohort was investigating those anatomical differences in the sexes even in the '50s when a sexual puritanical morality was the rule.

It would be so easy to abide by society norms, not being persecuted as a 'queer'. People die for sex all the time.

Your rant about Barbara Eden might be a display of a deeply closeted person. Like, you "know I ain't prejudiced I have black friends".



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727177 Shark, great post +3/-3     
Author:Old Guy
4/21/2022 7:29:05 PM

Reply to: 2727170

It appears they do not understand that the bill was about 6 to 8 year olds.

OR, they are sicker than I considered.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727194 Pooty- why is it EVERY sexual animal displays homosexuality if it isn't  +3/-3     
Author:Shooting Shark
4/21/2022 10:45:39 PM

Reply to: 2727170

Crowbot,

As a deeply closeted Lib -tard I don't expect you to understand this issue. You seem to think you're a "Republican" and seem to advocate for returning the Republican Party to being a scape goat for the Democrat mafia. Good job if you can get it, being a RINO-- you can gaslight the grey haired old ladies and angry old men seeing their fixed incomes being inflated away by shameless ignorant puppets like Creepy Joe, and never be in a position to change a damn thing!

That's why you hate Trumpism., or shall we call it "DeSantism?"

You know, this is why Democrats can't win. Their house is build on sand, when their agenda is finally recognized by the masses, the masses get out their clubs and pitch forks. November will be a bloodbath, and you only have yourselves to blame. 


But I digress.

Now to your comment vis a vis animals and homosexuality. Perhaps you have a lavender tinge to your own sexuality  and to compare yourself to s chimpanzee makes you feel better about opposing what you imagine as "puritanical sexual morality?"

No one who has lived as long as you and I can say we are ignorant of human sexual choices and yes, " animal instincts" but the problem I see with your point is

We are not animals. We are human.

(oops.. You humans are human-- I almost forgot I'm a Great White Shark!) 

You might try to define that difference. Being a secular humanist at heart, you have little time for a religious analysis of what it means to be a "human made in thd image of God" apparently. Most people today have been educated by naturalistic evolutionist propaganda (bad 19th century science) to imagine they are just animals.

So you look down to the animal kingdom as a guide for human behavior. One of the enobling characteristics of Western Civilization was that it's conception of humankind was based on a Creation of an intelligent creator.

When God created this world he apparently started with Bacteria ("let there be life") and over the course of a billion years or so, humans emerged from that process. God "created man from the dust of the earth and breathed into him the breath of LIFE, and man BECAME a LIVING SOUL"

that "soul" is eternal, immaterial, and made in the image of its creator. That's what makes you human.

 

Animals are to a degree, sentient beings. Sin and evil are common to humans only, because they often recognize they violate their own higher nature.

And so, describing sexual immorality of his own time (Romans) Saint Paul recognized that 

" though they knew God, they worshipped the creature rather than the creator" God gave them over to their unclean lusts. He endorsed human freedom as an extension of His own Divine nature. But humans would rather damage themselves and destroy their own higher natures in order to pursue fleshly pleasures, which in turn leades to greater excesses, until, like Sodom and Gomorrah they reap the fruits of their own perversions,

"their condemnation is just" Paul concluded.

Does that mean "God hates f a g s " --as the Crazy Baptist-Okie Cult claims?

On the contrary. Jesus died for all mankind's sin, because

"God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whosoever believed on him should not perish, but have eternal life."

The jury is out concerning Gods finsl judgement of individuals. I am not that judge. But apparently, you humans have a BIG unresolved problem, seen throughout your recorded history, a problem you won't ever solve by modeling the behavior of mere brute animals acting on instinct alone. 

There is much to  humans that involves language and intelligence which is not common to the animals. Since you Libz aarently want to think you're a bunch of souped-up chimpanzees, you often act that way.. and to comfort yourselves in your sexual ( human ) perversions you NOW insist on brainwashing FIVE year olds?!

Jesus, the crucified,  would-be savior of your eternal souls. had no time for what you (and Disney) are presently advocating ..

"If anyone causes any of these little-ones to sin.." ( read brainwashing them into pre-pubecent gender confusion, and maybe making them would-be anchovies on Hillary's Pizza! A pedophile paradise, led by Mickey Mouse himself..)

It would be better for them on the Day of Judgement that they be tossed into the sea with a millstone tied around their neck"

Yeah. I'm thinking of all the broken lives, and destroyed health and futures of humans who enter apparenyly "looking down" and serving their animal "instincts" ( actually driven by lower brain functions) rather than "lookin up" to the Creator  and accepting his enlightenment and hope for their personal salvation.

People like you, who endorse sexual deviance, abortion, eugenics, and The BIG LIE, all hope in vain ( and support your criminally insane politicians) looking for a better world.

You haven't found it yet. "Welcome to the Jungle."

Satan, afterall, was characterized as "the father of lies, and a murder from the beginning"

It isn't "hate" that inspires this present parental rebellion against everything you and the "Woke left" believes and wants to teach our children. Your present foolish fight is not against flesh and blood, but against the Spirit and love of God which you have choosen to reject.

Saint Paul was correct in his analysis of this problem.

(Wisdom 2000 years old, and counting!) 

Thus Quoth the Whales.

Our Libz are unwittingly,

in fact,

Satan's  

Useful idiots! 

 

 

 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727508 Pooty- why is it EVERY sexual animal displays homosexuality if it isn't  +2/-1     
Author:TheCrow
4/25/2022 11:12:24 AM

Reply to: 2727194

Pooty- why is it EVERY sexual animal displays homosexuality if it isn't 

As a deeply closeted Lib -tard I don't expect you to understand this issue. You seem to think you're a "Republican" and seem to advocate for returning the Republican Party to being a scape goat for the Democrat mafia. Good job if you can get it, being a RINO-- you can gaslight the grey haired old ladies and angry old men seeing their fixed incomes being inflated away by shameless ignorant puppets like Creepy Joe, and never be in a position to change a damn thing!


"Lib -tard" is a word without meaning from an, ah? what? A poster who presents himself as a garbage eater. Garbage in, garbage out.

The so-called "Republican Party" is no longer republican. It is a Trump puppet. I support the Lincoln Project.

 

 

That's why you hate Trumpism., or shall we call it "DeSantism?"

DeSantis is not Donald Trump:

Why Never Trumpers Should Bet on DeSantis Now

The Florida governor is flawed, but within normal parameters. The former president poses a unique threat.

 

You know, this is why Democrats can't win. Their house is build on sand, when their agenda is finally recognized by the masses, the masses get out their clubs and pitch forks. November will be a bloodbath, and you only have yourselves to blame. 


But I digress.

Now to your comment vis a vis animals and homosexuality. Perhaps you have a lavender tinge to your own sexuality  and to compare yourself to s chimpanzee makes you feel better about opposing what you imagine as "puritanical sexual morality?"

"Perhaps"?  It could well be so. As soon as I get done sexing up all the buxom wenches/wives, I might try that. I don't see that possibilty ever existing, half the world's population is female.

I used to subscribe to The National Lampoon and as it said the odd missing limb or extra bits don't disqualify any woman from being my 'wife for the night' or twenty minutes in the dark. Suppurating sores are a disqualifier, however.

 

No one who has lived as long as you and I can say we are ignorant of human sexual choices and yes, " animal instincts" but the problem I see with your point is We are not animals. We are human.

(oops.. You humans are human-- I almost forgot I'm a Great White Shark!) 

Humans are, indeed, animals. Look it up.

 

You might try to define that difference. Being a secular humanist at heart, you have little time for a religious analysis of what it means to be a "human made in thd image of God" apparently. Most people today have been educated by naturalistic evolutionist propaganda (bad 19th century science) to imagine they are just animals.

I never said humanity was 'just animals'. However, we are animals but very, very unique animals.

 

So you look down to the animal kingdom as a guide for human behavior. One of the enobling characteristics of Western Civilization was that it's conception of humankind was based on a Creation of an intelligent creator.

Humanity did not create God. Your premise is false.

 

 

When God created this world he apparently started with Bacteria ("let there be life") and over the course of a billion years or so, humans emerged from that process. God "created man from the dust of the earth and breathed into him the breath of LIFE, and man BECAME a LIVING SOUL"

that "soul" is eternal, immaterial, and made in the image of its creator. That's what makes you human.

How do you know any of that? What evidence do you have that animals do not have a soul? If you can't prove that, you can't exclude any living thing from incorporating a soul.

 

Animals are to a degree, sentient beings. Sin and evil are common to humans only, because they often recognize they violate their own higher nature.

Again, how do you know that?

 

And so, describing sexual immorality of his own time (Romans) Saint Paul recognized that " though they knew God, they worshipped the creature rather than the creator" God gave them over to their unclean lusts. He endorsed human freedom as an extension of His own Divine nature. But humans would rather damage themselves and destroy their own higher natures in order to pursue fleshly pleasures, which in turn leades to greater excesses, until, like Sodom and Gomorrah they reap the fruits of their own perversions,

"their condemnation is just" Paul concluded.

Prove that Saint Paul existed.

 

Does that mean "God hates f a g s " --as the Crazy Baptist-Okie Cult claims?

On the contrary. Jesus died for all mankind's sin, because

"God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whosoever believed on him should not perish, but have eternal life."

The jury is out concerning Gods finsl judgement of individuals. I am not that judge. But apparently, you humans have a BIG unresolved problem, seen throughout your recorded history, a problem you won't ever solve by modeling the behavior of mere brute animals acting on instinct alone. 

I don't believe that God will condemn any souls, period. The God knows that mankind is flawed, and is capable of infinite mercy and forgiveness.

 

There is much to humans that involves language and intelligence which is not common to the animals.

If mankind are not animals, what are we? Easy question for a completely detached observer, like a shark. I don't expect much of you, it is a demonstrated fact that sharks will eat anything they can swallow.

 

Since you Libz aarently want to think you're a bunch of souped-up chimpanzees, you often act that way.. and to comfort yourselves in your sexual ( human ) perversions you NOW insist on brainwashing FIVE year olds?!

Interesting statement. You believe that teaching children of the dangers they may encounter is somehow wrong, sinful.

 

Jesus, the crucified,  would-be savior of your eternal souls. had no time for what you (and Disney) are presently advocating ..

"If anyone causes any of these little-ones to sin.." ( read brainwashing them into pre-pubecent gender confusion, and maybe making them would-be anchovies on Hillary's Pizza! A pedophile paradise, led by Mickey Mouse himself..)

It would be better for them on the Day of Judgement that they be tossed into the sea with a millstone tied around their neck"

As far as I know, Disney is not advocating homosexuality. Admitting the existence of something is not the same as promoting it, nor is respecting the "right to privacy in bedrooms", as it were. 

 

Yeah. I'm thinking of all the broken lives, and destroyed health and futures of humans who enter apparenyly "looking down" and serving their animal "instincts" ( actually driven by lower brain functions) rather than "lookin up" to the Creator  and accepting his enlightenment and hope for their personal salvation.

Now, there is some bullsh. YOU have absolutely no idea of my religious opinion.

 

People like you, who endorse sexual deviance, abortion, eugenics, and The BIG LIE, all hope in vain ( and support your criminally insane politicians) looking for a better world.

You haven't found it yet. "Welcome to the Jungle."

It's very telling that you have to invent stuff to argue your position. Extremely Trumpist.

 

 

m>Satan, afterall, was characterized as "the father of lies, and a murder from the beginning"

It isn't "hate" that inspires this present parental rebellion against everything you and the "Woke left" believes and wants to teach our children. Your present foolish fight is not against flesh and blood, but against the Spirit and love of God which you have choosen to reject.


Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

 

Saint Paul was correct in his analysis of this problem.

Prove that Saint Paul existed. If you can't, the principle you argue is just as unfounded as the principle you say he propagated.

 

(Wisdom 2000 years old, and counting!) 

Thus Quoth the Whales.

Our Libz are unwittingly, in fact, Satan's Useful idiots! 

Prove that Satan exists. Again, if you can't, you express a dogmatic opinion.

The Bible is not scientifically or historically a factual, credible document. It is a message that each of us interprets in FAITH. Faith is not, and can not be historical, scientifically proven.

 

 

P.S. What is a 'lib'? Your posts present them as being people who do not have absolute faith in Trump or his presidency.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727517 P.S. Trump is not, was not ever a "Republican" any more than I am a car if +2/-0     
Author:TheCrow
4/25/2022 1:09:13 PM

Reply to: 2727508

P.S. Trump is not, was not ever a "Republican" any more than I am a car if I am in the garage.

Putting my cars in the garage is taking advantage of an opportunity. Trump saw the chaos in the Republican Party as an opportunity for self-promotion and self-benefit. 

"Probably the most celebrated adapter of the expression was another great wit from the Dublin literary scene, the Irish Republican and self-proclaimed "drinker with a writing problem", Brendan Behan. Behan's boisterous lifestyle meant that for him, more than others, there was truth in his opinion that:

"There's no such thing as bad publicity except your own obituary."

We saw Trump's obituary in 2020, he's dead and doesn't know it. Losing a presidential election to Joe Biden who is spectacularly the proverbial second choice for POTUS in the Democratic Party?

Only Trump as the other choice could get Joe Biden the presidency. At least he's not Trump. who killed a million Americans with his delayed response to Covid 19 which caused the sharpest economic contraction and highest unemployment rate since the Great Depression.

Who would want that president reelected? Blindly loyal TrumpeRINOs.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727171 Fair warning: Sometime today you may hear that Tucker Carlson featured a g +3/-0     
Author:TheCrow
4/21/2022 4:23:42 PM

Reply to: 2727154

Why Tucker Worries About Testosterone

Plus: Mike Lee, coup plotter.

Happy Monday.

Fair warning: Sometime today you may hear that Tucker Carlson featured a guest who recommended using “testicle tanning” to raise flagging testosterone levels.

You will be tempted to think this is a joke.

It is not.

Behold:

Tucker Carlson's New Special Promotes Testicle Tanning

Fitness professional Andrew McGovern told Carlson: “If you want to optimise and take it to another level, expose yourself to red light therapy…”

“Which is testicle tanning,” the presenter asked.

Mr McGovern continued: “It’s testicle tanning, but it’s also full body red light therapy, which has [a] massive amount of benefits. There’s so much data that isn’t being picked up.

“It’s not crazy to seek solutions, and I was recently exposed to a term called ‘bromeopathy’, and I think there’s a lot of people out there right now that don’t trust the mainstream information.”

You may also hear about a certain homoerotic promo for Tucker’s docu-whatever on Manhood.

You will also be tempted to think it is a parody.

It is not.

Critics… were taken aback by the striking homoerotic nature of the trailer for his upcoming “documentary” about what he calls the “collapse” of testosterone levels in men.

The steamy trailer for the first episode of his new season of “Tucker Carlson Originals” features a series of shots of half-nude, muscular (white) men. They’re pumping rubber, chopping wood, grilling, firing a gun — and wrestling — accompanied by the soaring, thumping musical theme “Thus Spoke Zarathustra,” which was widely popularized in the 1968 film “2001: A Space Odyssey.”

Oddly, many of the men’s faces are blurred out or hidden. In one scene, a naked man stands with arms outstretched and genitals illuminated behind what one observer said looks like a Tesla recharging station.

Twitter avatar for @NikkiMcRnikki mccann ramírez @NikkiMcR
I promise you are not prepared for Tucker's latest montage
 

The only thing missing from Tucker’s fantasy-montage is a shirtless Vladimir Putin, which is surely an oversight. (For some context, here’s something I wrote about the right’s increasing obsession with its idea of “manliness.” There’s a history here.)

 

(Yeah, I expect Trump pictures himself somewhat like this)

 

Is Donald Trump Manly?

But Carlson’s hard pivot toward oiled up manly-manliness is also more than a bit ironic, as the Daily Beast’s Justin Baragona noted:

Justin Baragona @justinbaragona
 
Tucker would get arrested if he showed this video in a Florida classroom.

nikki mccann ramírez @NikkiMcR

I promise you are not prepared for Tucker's latest montage https://t.co/8tdvYTW2cn


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727173 Thanks Sharky, You Proved My Point Exactly... +3/-0     
Author:Jett
4/21/2022 5:56:00 PM

Reply to: 2727154

Like I said and you said, children are already being indoctrinated by the Extreme Right... 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727196 Thanks Sharky, You Proved My Point Exactly... +1/-3     
Author:Shooting Shark
4/21/2022 10:54:04 PM

Reply to: 2727173

Casting my "pearls before swine" apparently.

Do you think those high heels look good on you, Jetsheep?

"Clothes make the man" as they say, but they don't make you a woman !

Dont worry, Jetsheep.

Youre still my favorite

Useful Idiot! 

 

 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727197 Thanks Sharky, You Proved My Point Exactly... +1/-2     
Author:Shooting Shark
4/21/2022 10:54:05 PM

Reply to: 2727173

Casting my "pearls before swine" apparently.

Do you think those high heels look good on you, Jetsheep?

"Clothes make the man" as they say, but they don't make you a woman !

Dont worry, Jetsheep.

Youre still my favorite

Useful Idiot! 

 

 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727214 Old guy, more projection from you? +2/-0     
Author:bladeslap
4/22/2022 8:17:37 AM

Reply to: 2727141

There are gay couples walking around all over the place. You think the kids should not know that it exists?

I thought you were a bit brighter than that.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727227 Yes! We teach them “stranger danger “ (NT) +1/-2     
Author:Old Guy
4/22/2022 10:48:43 AM

Reply to: 2727214


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727236 Yes! We teach them “stranger danger “ +3/-1     
Author:TheCrow
4/22/2022 11:43:15 AM

Reply to: 2727227

And there it is: bigotry.

In old guys mind being a pedophile and being gay are one and the same thing. If he is aware of a member of ANY demographic doing anything wrong, sinful then that is his impression of the whole group.

Yes, there are homosexual pedos, just as there hetero pedos.

You are a sorry model for TrumpeRINO.

Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727313 Yes! We teach them “stranger danger “ +2/-2     
Author:Shooting Shark
4/23/2022 11:20:35 AM

Reply to: 2727236

"Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding"


I guess that leaves you out, Crowbot. 

you constantly "multiply words without understanding "

clearly a fool

and

useful idiot!  



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727503 Yes! We teach them “stranger danger “ +2/-1     
Author:TheCrow
4/25/2022 10:04:01 AM

Reply to: 2727313

you constantly "multiply words without understanding " clearly a fool

 

Here's a point: TrumpeRINOs support a man who is clearly a liar, a cheat and a thief for POTUS.

He has repeatedly stated that he wants to eliminate the presidential election and rule this country as an autocrat. This country fought a war to eliminate monarchs ruling...

You're no patriot anymore than Trump. 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2727504 Trump just joked about being president for life — for the 6th time +2/-0     
Author:TheCrow
4/25/2022 10:06:16 AM

Reply to: 2727313

President Trump apparently likes to toy with the Constitution.

In a tweetstorm on Thursday, Trump spun from touting that day's White House social media summit to providing some nicknames for 2020 Democrats. But in between, he made at least his sixth joke about staying in office for a few extra years.

Trump started by saying that he'll "ultimately leave office in six years," which has a good chance of coming true, but added that it could be "10 or 14." Trump did add "just kidding" after this obviously unconstitutional idea, but it's far from the first time he's made it.

In March of last year, Trump tossed around the idea of being "president for life" after praising China's President Xi Jinping for granting that same term extension to himself. He brought up the subject again this April at a White House event, specifically using the same "10 or 14 years" to describe his potential time left in office.

In May, Trump retweeted Evangelical leader Jerry Falwell Jr.'s suggestion that he's owed "2 yrs added to his 1st term" due to distractions caused by the Mueller investigation. Last month, Trump tweeted again to ask if the "people would demand I stay longer." And a few weeks later, Trump retweeted an absurd meme video showing him running for reelection in the year 90,000, suggesting that both the Constitution and the finite amount of energy contained within the human body do not apply to him.



Return-To-Index