Click here to close
New Message Alert
List Entire Thread
Msg ID: 2728444 Abortion disproportionately kills minority babies +4/-4     
Author:Shooting Shark
5/4/2022 1:55:11 AM

Why do Libz hate people of color? 

yhere is no end to your depravity, Libz! 

 Ever since Margaret Sanger met with the KKK,

blacks have been targeted by abortion providers  

Jesse Jackson once call it a "Black Genocide"

But he was silenced by big money and white Libz! 

Big money has always supported eugenics

for 100 years in the US.

You Libz are racist..

it's not what you say...

It's what it's what you support!

Activist Libz don't need a "constitutional right" to abortion.

Bill of Rights: Let the State legislatures decide!

useful idiots!




Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728454 Who do you hate people of color? +2/-4     
Author:bladeslap
5/4/2022 9:42:57 AM

Reply to: 2728444

To draw that conclusion shows where your heart is.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728462 Who do you hate people of color? +3/-3     
Author:Shooting Shark
5/4/2022 10:55:41 AM

Reply to: 2728454

WEAK, Buddha!

Where is your head?

Didnt you mom teach you not to talk to strangers?

That's because the "nice stranger" may offer you candy

but he really want to make you

an anchovie on Hillary's Pizza!


The MSM and DNC collective have twisted you mind

 

If you can't see why abortion is a great evil perpetrated on innocents

and why the State Legislators should decide

( subject to the Will of the voters, actual DEMOCRACY)

then you support dictators, it's your instinct apparently.

Liz are anything but "liberal".. their leaders are their MASTERS

("strangers" as it were) 

Useful Idiot! 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728475 For conservatives, abortion is about controlling women... +3/-2     
Author:Jett
5/4/2022 1:02:56 PM

Reply to: 2728462

White male conservatives believe that they own their women and that they are superior to women. They will quote you bible scripture to back that up. 

They want control of women, their bodies, and child birth decisions. Women can't be allowed to make decisions like that for themselves as they are the property of their man. Redneck states where you can legally take another man out if you catch him with your wife is a perfect example of their ownership of their women.

And again, they will head straight to their bibles to back that up just like they do with justifying their hate for Gay people. 

State legislators shouldn't decide jack shit when it comes to human rights, in the redneck states all of the legislators are the types of individuals that I just described above. It's their right by Gawd! You know better than to go popular vote, polls show that half or more of even the redneck states would keep abortion legal by popular vote, bless their hearts.

I salute Amazon and other American companies for standing up and doing the right thing for their employees, standing up for women and their rights is vital.

 

"Amazon, one of the biggest private-sector employers in the U.S., told its staff on May 2 it will pay up to $4,000 in travel expenses annually for employees to undergo abortions and other "non-life-threatening" medical treatments, Reuters reported. The company will pay $10,000 in annual travel reimbursements for urgent, life-threatening medical issues.

Amazon's new benefit, retroactively effective to Jan. 1, applies if abortion procedures or other operations are not available within 100 miles of an employee's home. It is open to U.S. employees or covered dependents, whether they work in a corporate office or a warehouse. Amazon employs 1.1 million full- and part-time workers throughout the U.S.

In March, Citigroup disclosed that it would cover out-of-state travel costs for employees seeking an abortion if they are located in Texas and other states where access to abortion has been restricted. After the investment banking firm's announcement, other big companies—including Apple, Levi Strauss, Yelp, Match, Lyft and Uber—said that they, too, would pay for out-of-state abortion travel under their health plans."

   



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728478 Who do you hate people of color? +3/-1     
Author:bladeslap
5/4/2022 1:26:56 PM

Reply to: 2728462

You didnt' answer the question ...

Do you hate peopel of color?

Why are you singling them out?

 




Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728500 Who do you hate people of color? +3/-2     
Author:Shooting Shark
5/4/2022 5:04:57 PM

Reply to: 2728478

Reading comprehension, Buddha.

You support Abortion. That's murder.

Black babies are murdered at 3-4 time the rate of white babies. 
I think for once Crowbot my be almost correct about something..

White Libz who support abortive are racist

which side are you on? 

Stay outta Texas!

Useful idiot! 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728543 White liberals (both men and women) are the biggest +2/-2     
Author:Founding Fathers
5/5/2022 12:48:57 PM

Reply to: 2728454

danger to the black race.

Walter E. Williams 

The worst enemy of black people 

Malcolm X: Liberals have tricked black people into thinking whites will solve their problems 

 

Malcolm X was a Muslim minister and human rights activist. Born in 1925, he met his death at the hands of an assassin in 1965. Malcolm X was a courageous advocate for black civil rights, but unlike Martin Luther King Jr., he was not that forgiving of whites for their crimes against black Americans. He did not eschew violence as a tool to achieve civil and human rights. His black and white detractors accused him of preaching racism and violence. Despite the controversy, he has been called one of the greatest and most influential black Americans. 

Many black Americans have great respect for Malcolm X. Many schools bear his name, and many streets have been renamed in honor of him, both at home and abroad. But while black Americans honor Malcolm X, one of his basic teachings goes largely ignored. I think it’s an important lesson, so I will quote a large part of it.

Malcolm X said: “The worst enemy that the Negro have is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros and calling himself a liberal, and it is following these white liberals that has perpetuated problems that Negros have. If the Negro wasn’t taken, tricked or deceived by the white liberal, then Negros would get together and solve our own problems. I only cite these things to show you that in America, the history of the white liberal has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white liberal was going to solve our problems. Our problems will never be solved by the white man.”

There’s a historical tidbit that those much younger than I (almost 83 years old) are ignorant of. In black history, we have been called — and called ourselves — several different names. Among the more respectable have been “colored,” “Negro,” “black,” “Afro-American” and “African-American.” I recall when Mrs. Viola Meekins, when I was a student at Stoddart-Fleisher Junior High School in the late 1940s, had our class go page by page through a textbook and correct each instance in which Negro was printed with a lowercase “n.” In Malcolm X’s day, and mine, Negro was a proud name and not used derisively by blacks as it is today.

Malcolm X was absolutely right about our finding solutions to our own problems. The most devastating problems that black people face today have absolutely nothing to do with our history of slavery and discrimination. Chief among them is the breakdown of the black family, wherein 75 percent of blacks are born to single, often young, mothers. In some cities and neighborhoods, the percentage of out-of-wedlock births is over 80. Actually, “breakdown” is the wrong term; the black family doesn’t form in the first place. This is entirely new among blacks.

According to the 1938 Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, that year only 11 percent of black children were born to unwed mothers. As late as 1950, female-headed households constituted only 18 percent of the black population. Today it’s close to 70 percent. In much earlier times, during the late 1800s, there were only slight differences between the black family structure and those of other ethnic groups. In New York City in 1925, 85 percent of kin-related black households were two-parent households. Welfare has encouraged young women to have children out of wedlock. The social stigma once associated with unwed pregnancy is all but gone. Plus, “shotgun” weddings are a thing of the past. That was when male members of a girl’s family made the boy who got her pregnant live up to his responsibilities.

The high crime rates in so many black communities impose huge personal costs and have turned once-thriving communities into economic wastelands. The Ku Klux Klan couldn’t sabotage chances for black academic excellence more effectively than the public school system in most cities. Politics and white liberals will not solve these and other problems. As Malcolm X said, “Our problems will never be solved by the white man.”

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University and a columnist for Creators Syndicate.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2729010 LET THAT HATE FLOW (NT) +1/-1     
Author:observer II
5/11/2022 9:10:57 AM

Reply to: 2728454


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728485 Abortion disproportionately kills minority babies +3/-0     
Author:TheCrow
5/4/2022 2:27:34 PM

Reply to: 2728444

Pooty, yiour graph reflects something that you deny: America is racist. There's reason that African American homeowner rate is so much lower than white folk. 


 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728486 P.S. The upshot is that the poor don't want another mouth to feed... (NT) +3/-1     
Author:TheCrow
5/4/2022 2:29:18 PM

Reply to: 2728485


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728532 You make me sick to think +1/-2     
Author:Old Guy
5/5/2022 10:35:09 AM

Reply to: 2728486

You evidently think it is just fine to kill a baby so you will have one less person at the dinner table.  Why don't you just support abortions for children anytime they become a problem, a financial hardship.   like up to 18 years old.  



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728539 And whenever you're ready, let's discuss when the zygote is a person. +2/-1     
Author:TheCrow
5/5/2022 12:23:35 PM

Reply to: 2728532

And whenever you're ready, let's discuss when the zygote is a person.

A woman's body is hers to control entirely. Until that adversely affects another.

In some religions the soul exists before conception. Prevention pregnancy is therefore murder.

In some religions, ensoulment occurs at conception, making it a person. Miscarriage is murder or at the very least manslaughter.

IN some religions, ensoulment occurs at birth or at some time afterwards.

So which is fact, not based on revealed, religious opinion?

 

 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728487 And whenever you're ready, let's discuss when the zygote is a person. (NT) +3/-1     
Author:TheCrow
5/4/2022 2:33:00 PM

Reply to: 2728444


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728499 And whenever you're ready, let's discuss when the zygote is a person. +3/-3     
Author:Shooting Shark
5/4/2022 5:02:18 PM

Reply to: 2728487

You don't even think St Paul was a person.

You Libz should abort yourselves! 

Oh, wait, November is coming!

Useful idiots! 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728542 "You don't even think St Paul was a person." Hyperbolic exaggeration. +2/-1     
Author:TheCrow
5/5/2022 12:42:14 PM

Reply to: 2728499

I never, ever said that Paul/Saul of Tarsus was not a person. I said that there is no proof of his existence.

The writing attributed to that individual were recorded at least a century after his death.

I am not a lib. I am an American conservative but not dogmatic. I think for myself.

 



Oh, wait, November is coming!


Yes, and the party in power will, as usual lose some elections.

Planning another violent riot if it doesn't go your way? There is no, none, zero evidence of significant error in the 2020 election, period. The election has been audited numerous times, Trump lost. Not an unreasonable result considering that even Hillary received more popular votes in 2016 than Trump. Hillary got 48.2% of that count while The Donald could count 46.1%. Trump was elected as the Founding Fathers wished, by state electors- 304 to Hillary's 227.

 

2020 was almost a complete reversal of 2016, a resounding defeat for the incumbent, Trump. Joe Biden won the popular vote, 51.3% to Trump's 46.9%; and the electoral college magnified that, 306 electoral votes to The Donald's 232.  

The foundation of American democracy is the peaceful acceptance of the will of the people expressed in elections. You and Trump attack that concept, treason! and you are a traitor.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728564 "You don't even think St Paul was a person." Hyperbolic exaggeration. +1/-2     
Author:Shooting Shark
5/5/2022 7:22:12 PM

Reply to: 2728542

"I never, ever said that Paul/Saul of Tarsus was not a person. I said that there is no proof of his existence."

Nonsense. I haven't got time for your semantics, Crowbot. A person needs to EXIST before he can be a person. You wanted to desparage Pauls conversion and his message. Therefore you qustioned his EXISTENCE.

perhaps you should say what sort of Evidence you would accept?

be sure it applies to all ancient figures .. in other words apply the same standar.

wait, that would be impossible for a postmodern 

Useful idiot.

ps you are not a conservative. 

show us --Evidence--of your being a conservative! 

useful idiot! 

 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728602 "You don't even think St Paul was a person." Hyperbolic exaggeration. +2/-1     
Author:TheCrow
5/6/2022 11:34:10 AM

Reply to: 2728564

"I never, ever said that Paul/Saul of Tarsus was not a person. I said that there is no proof of his existence."

Nonsense. I haven't got time for your semantics, Crowbot. A person needs to EXIST before he can be a person. You wanted to desparage Pauls conversion and his message. Therefore you qustioned his EXISTENCE.

You twist the logic into the most favorable fashion. I'll repeat "that there is no proof of his existence."

 

perhaps you should say what sort of Evidence you would accept?
be sure it applies to all ancient figures .. in other words apply the same standar. 
(sic)

And I don't need to apply the same standard to any and all historical figures as we're not discussing them, are we?



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728615 P.S. Saul/Paul might not have written his scriptures. Did you ever play the +2/-1     
Author:TheCrow
5/6/2022 12:05:55 PM

Reply to: 2728602

P.S. Saul/Paul might not have written his scriptures. Did you ever play the 'telephone game'? The message changes with reptation, doesn't it? The Gospels were written at least a hundred years and interpreted into different languages in the process. 

How many different accounts of Jesus birth are in the New Testament. Some books present Jesus as a fully grown man presenting his Gospels with no biography to speak of.

 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728812 P.S. Saul/Paul might not have written his scriptures. Did you ever play the +1/-2     
Author:Shooting Shark
5/8/2022 5:37:44 PM

Reply to: 2728615

aaybe"Changing goal posts? 
Admit you were wrong to say
"there is no Evidence of Paul's Existence"

And be the first Lib on this board

who has enough self awareness to admit

when hes been shown to be wrong.

Now You wAnna say Paul never wrote his epistles

you would need to argue from a better "scientific"standpoint than

"maybe "

(Maybe Captain Picard broke the prime directive and travelled back in time on the Starship Enterprise and appeared to Saul on the Road to Damascus, caused temporary cataracts in Saul from the proximity of his transporter location-- and deliberately altered history of Western  civilization ? )

unproven speculations 

show me!

useful idiot! 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2728853 First, last and always: I am not a lib. Next- I was wrong. Done. +3/-0     
Author:TheCrow
5/9/2022 11:33:29 AM

Reply to: 2728812

The difference between TrumpeRINO frogboys and intgelligent, rational people is that TrumpeRINO frogboys ignore the fact that Trump has never been Republican or conservative.

Paul/Saul of Tarsus did indeed exist and his writings are very, very important to Christianity.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2729108 First, last and always: I am not a lib. Next- I was wrong. Done. +2/-2     
Author:Shooting Shark
5/12/2022 12:20:06 AM

Reply to: 2728853

You are a Lib until you Prove otherwise 

We have seen no evidence you are NOT a lib

 (quite the contrary)

But thank you for being sane enough

to admit you were wrong about Saint Paul. 

You are the first Lib in the history of this message board

perhaps the history of leftist propagandists

to admit you were wrong.

( Except David Horowitz-- there may be hope for you too? 


What's the problem with all the other

Useful Idiots? 



Return-To-Index