Old guy states Bill Barr thinks that it was stolen and that he wishes laws would be passed to stop the democrats ...

Then, he witnessed the post from Barrr stating that he told Trump "You lost and get over it" ...

Old guy has been SILENT...Not a peep...

Old guy? 

care to explain?

He's either going to dig a hole or?

Old Dude's whole world revolves around donnie trump and the Big Lie. It's much more a Cult than a political movement...   

Looking at the bigger picture is not something you do.  Barr is trying to sell a book, and as normal his statements made, are take out of content.  Barr's opinion is just that, Barr's  opinion.  But you think Barr has big issues with Trump, NOT, he has repeatedly expressed he will vote for Trump again!  Does not sound like he has any issues With Trump!  Fact is he has repeatedly said ""Trumps policies far exceeded anything from the democrats!"

For some reason you think Barr's opinion about the election has value.  His opinion does not come from a great reputation of seeking the truth.  Remember he spent over a couple years investigation Hillary, who everyone knows destroyed evidence, and he found nothing.  His investigation into the election was only 10 days, from the time he ordered the investigation to his statement he found insufficient fraud.  Do you really think any investigation by the government could happen in 10 days.

What amazes me the most about you and your ridiculous point of view.  There is NO QUESTION, the election was NOT conducted by the constitution, in some states.   It wasn't and you know it, American knows it.

Suppose I presented that issue like this: given the choice between Trump and the archetypical Democratic candidate for POTUS, who would you vote for? Hillary or Trump?

Those were the major party candidates in 2016 and both were unacceptable. Hillary did not run in 2020, but Joe Biden did and and recieved the third definite majority vote- 51.3%, since Bush 2004- Obama's 2008 52.9% and 2012 50.9%.

"His investigation into the election was only 10 days, from the time he ordered the investigation to his statement he found insufficient fraud.  Do you really think any investigation by the government could happen in 10 days."

Your bias in the statement is clear- "insufficient fraud"? Not no fraud, but not sufficient to justify more investigation.

The question I have for you is: Was the election sufficiently fair and credible such that Barr's conclusion was justified? Or was the election stolen as you frequently allege?

It is obvious that the election was stolen.

In some states it was not even conducted as per the constitution.  It was an illegal election.

What do you mean by sufficiently fair, that implies you are aware of areas or things NOT FAIR.

And none of those items, addressed.  Even the Supreme Court ignored the issues.

Election issues became like a Pandora's box, Oh! My God don't open up that!

It remindeds me of the FAA coming to vist, and everyone running around to conver up stuff, hide stuff and the counciling of younger employees about what to and what not to say.

"It is obvious that the election was stolen.

"In some states it was not even conducted as per the constitution.  It was an illegal election."

Accepted as Constitutional in every responsible body's review....

But- you know the election waas 'stolen' how? Some self-serving party hack told you so and the claim is made for pure political purposes- to agitate and incite the base a la' January 6. Divide the country further, so that eventually Trump's coup d'état can not be reversed. 

What do you know about election law and the proceedings in the several states? I'll say youo know nothing. I reckon that the most ignorant body responsible for reviewing their elections results are more knowledgeable and reliable than you. This is the "Comet Ping Pong Pizza" scandal all over again. Nothing there but fantasies but it makes you feel like you're 'on the inside' and know more than your opposition.

"Even the Supreme Court ignored the issues." That's because there was nothing there.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled the election in Pennsyania was unconstitutional.  Other states still have court cases!

yes! the Supreme Court did ignore the issue, but your reason is a lie.

It's obvious that the election was stolen, you know it , you just have no ethics or morals to even look at any evidence, you just swear there isn't any.

you are a useful idiot