Abrams is saying that it will be easier for criminals to carry weapons into places of business.

Since when does a democrat care about criminals carrying? Aren't they the people bailing out criminals from jail after they commit a crime???? Hummmmm

Maybe Abrams should concentrate on holding criminals accountable for their crimes. Regardless of color. Rather than supressing law abiding citizens of Georgia.

She can't win.

Oshoff and Warnock will join her in defeat.

There is nothing they can do now to undo the economic disaster they have created. People know if they vote for these tools, they will have a very difficult time making ends meet and provide for their families.

People become poorer under democratic leadership. This has never been more evident then right now.

Abrams is galactically stupid.

Criminals don't obey the law, hence the name of their occupation.

No, the law doesn't allow criminals to carry, they're still not allowed to be in possession of a firearm.

But, there are probably enoug Useful Idiots in Georgia who will vote for her.....

No surprise you're weak on American civics:

Aren't they the people bailing out criminals from jail after they commit a crime???? Hummmmm

One can't post bail for a convicted felon, pucknutz.

The accused is innocent until convicted, due process and all that.

Righties are the ones who take suspects out of jail for lynching.

Kinda like y'all believe everybody who crosses our southern border, is as Trump put it:

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

P.S. illegal drugs wouldn't be profitable except in prohibition. Y'all enabling, enriching violent criminals killing, robbing, destroying American communities.

You want to see effective, non-destructive drug policy? The Switzerland's HAT- Heroin Assisted Treatment:

In addition, a cost–benefit analysis found that HAT produced a net savings balance (€5,966) per patient per year, whereas the costs of MMT remained greater than its calculated savings (minus €2,069) because of its inability to substantially reduce crime and criminal justice system costs.