Post after post you claimed Barr found NO EVIDENCE OF FRAUD.

A the time I posted that Barr never had time to investigate anything.  It was only two weeks from his investigation start to his conclusion of no fraud.  Anyone that knows anything, would know that NO INVESTIGATION HAPPENED IN TWO WEEKS.

But not you! You buy in, hook line and sinker, every bit of news that meets your useful idiot ideas.

Now we know, information requests reveal out of the 12 branches of the DOJ, there was NO INVESTIGATION For fraud, NONE!  NO RECORDS OF ANYTHING, NOT DONE!  BARR LIED, YOU LIED.

Don't waste my time Old Guy

You have zero credibility

70+ court cases .. no proof

DOJ investigation ... No Proof

Audit done and paid for by Trump Cyber Ninjas ... ZERO proof

You have issues ... Going to give you some reading material

Why do people believe in conspiracy theories? | Live Science

Do yourself a favor and read that ...

I don't think you're purposely lying ... you just don't know any better

LOOK!

If freedom of information requests are made to the DOJ for inspection data come back reporting NO investigation was made, then the DOJ never investigated.  DOJ investigations never happened.  Barr lied, You lied.

All most all of the court cases ignored evidence, more than half were about prcceedire, others viewed NO evidence.  Please list just one of your 70+ court cases that viewed evidence and question anyone that filed an affidavit.

You lie about the Arizona audit.  It had many findings of election errors.  It found the election system is so unreliable that now the state has passed laws that ballot machines will not be allowed.

You need to get a grip! The stolen election is way more than just a conspiracy theory, why do you think 62% of the population believes the election was stolen.

If a case, litigation, is filed, the judge wants to see some substantive evidence that the investigation is reasonable.

Trump had no evidence of substantial error or fraud in the 2020 election.

Were there irregularities? You bet. No human activity proceeds without errors. Is there any sign that that changed the outcome? No? If not, an investigation is not in order.

TrumpeRINo frog boys are hypocrites. Y'all cry fraud! Rigged election! And ignore Trump's substantiated efforts to corrupt the 2020 election.

 Führerprinzip! If the 'leader' does it, it is a good thing. Trump 'Grab'em by the p^ssy!' is equivalent to Biden stroking a girls hair...

It goes further ...

McCarthy wants to have congressional investigations into Biden's handling of the documents, yet for Trump, "It's DOJ abuse" ...

They are a bunch of hypocrites

I do not care what you two think!  You have proven to put your bias ahead of the truth.

Some examples:

1.  There is NO records of the DOJ ever investigating election fraud.  None!

2.  Pennsylvania Suprime Court ruled their election to be unconstitutional.

3.  WhenTrump had documents taken, he was the president.  He had total power to declassify any document.  He claims he did,  it requires NO PAPER WORK, for him to declassify anything.  He had no classified documents. He did have goverment document, the two cases are as different as night and day.

Those are examples of the truth.

Now you tell me why you believe the DOJ found NO fraud, when they did not even look?

Or how does the Pennsylvania election count, when it was conducted against the constitution?

Or why it is not abuse when the DOJ, treats Trump unjustly.  Where was the raid on Biden's home?  They knew he had classified documents, but instead of going thru his wifes underwear, they let lawyers that did not even have clearance for classified documents do it.  How is that no abuse?

How about a truthful answer to those questions..

I have asked you any question before that you never answer, how about this time!

I do not care what you two think!  You have proven to put your bias ahead of the truth.

I view you as full of projection - You project your insecurities and lies

Some examples:

1.  There is NO records of the DOJ ever investigating election fraud.  None!

Do you work at the DOJ? Can you please show us your "proof" that there was no investigation? And let's say you are correct ... Why would his own attorney general lie about it? 

You sound desperate grasping at straws

2.  Pennsylvania Suprime Court ruled their election to be unconstitutional.

No they did not rule the election was uconstitutional - This is why no one can have an honest conversation with you. You make up things, you lie left and right, you don't back it up with facts ...

Pennsylvania’s mail voting law ruled unconstitutional, but remains in place as Wolf appeals · Spotlight PA

The MAIL IN law was ruled as unconstitutional, not the election - But that's wha tyou do. You lie, then project and accuse others of it - You're not very good at it though.

3.  WhenTrump had documents taken, he was the president.  He had total power to declassify any document.  He claims he did,  it requires NO PAPER WORK, for him to declassify anything.  He had no classified documents. He did have goverment document, the two cases are as different as night and day.

No, that is 100% inaccurate. In order for a president to declassify, there is still a process he has to go through. 

No credible evidence has emerged that Mr. Trump issued any standing order to declassify everything he happened to take from the Oval Office, and national security legal specialists have greeted the notion with disdain. Glenn S. Gerstell, the top lawyer for the National Security Agency from 2015 to 2020, said the idea that whatever Mr. Trump happened to take upstairs each evening automatically became declassified — without logging what it was and notifying the agencies that used that information — was “preposterous.”

So, top secret launch codes, as an example, you think he declassified it You're so naive for even goign down that road. Trump screwed up, so his puppets like you are listening to everyting he's saying. He ignored a court subpoena and obstructed justice. 

Here's the reality and you can choose your poison

If it IS true that he declassified everything in his house, it the documents in his houes are of the highest level of national security, then he's a bumping idiot like you for doing that and then we'll judge him for his complete lack of judgement. But, since there is no paper trail that he declassified stuff, then it's not declassified.

You bleive his bullcrap hook line and sinker. He didn't declassify a single thing. You're just gullible and one of his puppets.

Those are examples of the truth.

Now you tell me why you believe the DOJ found NO fraud, when they did not even look?

Show us the document - You are flapping your gums but have shown no proof

ANd if there is NO evidence to start an investigation, then there can't be an investigation - They are given Leads ... If the leads don't pan out, then there is nothing to investigate. 

DOJ likely got the same exact thing Trump was dishing out - Completely nonsesical crap which did not warrant a full on investigatio - You and the alt-right election deniers have thrown the kitchen sink out and guess what - NOTHING STICKS - 

Or how does the Pennsylvania election count, when it was conducted against the constitution?

Educate yourself - They also said they're not reversing the election - It's a process thing, not fraud. Learn teh difference

Or why it is not abuse when the DOJ, treats Trump unjustly.  Where was the raid on Biden's home?  They knew he had classified documents, but instead of going thru his wifes underwear, they let lawyers that did not even have clearance for classified documents do it.  How is that no abuse?

The levels of your stupidity just amaze me --

Biden came forward and volunteered everything he had - He did not obstruct justice, did not go against a court order, did not have the Archives request documents that were missing. He didn't lie about what he had, did not mislead investigators. And he has a handfull, not 300 docs. We alos don't know the level of classifiction of documents - Trump may have had the highest level of Top secret and it's possible Bident's docs were simply classified - 

This is why you continue to irritate people  with your hypocrisy. You project and paint an exact picture of what and who you are - You are a biased self-centered egotist who doesn't mind if Trump sells the country out - You want him in no matter what at any cost - And people have to ask that quesiton why you love the traitor so much who admitted that he only ran because he wanted to be "more famous"

How about a truthful answer to those questions..

You got all the truthful answers - You don't love this country - You love a traitor who inflicted more damage to this country than you know

You cannot let go of your fragile ego and look at facts, not your conspiracy theories -

You continually push conspiracy theories day by day then you blame others of not being truthful ...

The reality is that every single thing you have pushed has turned out to be a dudd....

Reminder? Everyting you put on here is BS

Brunson hearing at Supreme Court - Rejected

PA Supreme Court said "Election was Unconstituational" - Wrong - They let the election stand

Voter fraud in Mi - WRONG - Audit proves otherwise 

Voter fraud in WI - WRONG - Audit proves otherwise

Voter fraud in AZ - WRONG - Audit proves othewise

Voter fraud in GA - WRONG - Audit proves otherwise

DOJ, VP, Senate Majority Leader, Ivanka, and countless others all stated "HE LOST"

Trump admitted to people, and repeated in sworn testimony, he KNEW HE LOST

Sworn testimony that trumpe stated "Just SAY there was fraud and I'll hanlde the rest"

---------

If you are unable to understand just how corrupt he is and that everything you have been stating has been completely debunked, then you need psychological help... There's nothing more any of us non-healthcare professionals can do on this site to help you 

I have asked you any question before that you never answer, how about this time!

Old guy, no amount of evidence will allow your ego to admit to you that you're wrong 

Sworn testimony that Trump ADMITTED that he lost the election ...

Sworn testimony that Trump said "Just tell them it was fraudulent" and I'll handle the rest ...

Can you try your hardest to explain to us what Trump meant by those?

I'll tell you - Trump knew he lost, but he said otherwise so

1. Naive people like you would continue to believe his BS and give him money

2. Naive people like you would believe him so that his Ego wouln't be so bruised...

Please explain to us ... How do you explain that multiple people under oath stated Trump said "Ya, I can't believe I lost to him" ... 

Think about that and lest that resonate in that head of yours