Suppose I presented that issue like this: given the choice between Trump   

Suppose I presented that issue like this: given the choice between Trump and the archetypical Democratic candidate for POTUS, who would you vote for? Hillary or Trump?

Those were the major party candidates in 2016 and both were unacceptable. Hillary did not run in 2020, but Joe Biden did and and recieved the third definite majority vote- 51.3%, since Bush 2004- Obama's 2008 52.9% and 2012 50.9%.

"His investigation into the election was only 10 days, from the time he ordered the investigation to his statement he found insufficient fraud.  Do you really think any investigation by the government could happen in 10 days."

Your bias in the statement is clear- "insufficient fraud"? Not no fraud, but not sufficient to justify more investigation.

The question I have for you is: Was the election sufficiently fair and credible such that Barr's conclusion was justified? Or was the election stolen as you frequently allege?